green
Positive treatment
1.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Edmund Patterson
In Blockburger , the Supreme Court stated that “where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not....” Blockburger, 284 U.S. at 304 , 52 S.Ct. at 182 ; see also May v. United States, 261 F.2d 629, 630 (9th Cir.1958) (applying Blockburger to uphold conviction for three counts of counterfeiting where two counts split one transaction into two offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 474 ), cert. denied, 359…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Davis
v.
Pegelow, Superintendent, District of Columbia Reformatory
v.
Pegelow, Superintendent, District of Columbia Reformatory
No. 703.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 18, 1959.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Motion for leave to- file petition for writ of habeas corpus and for other relief denied.