Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Tatnall Measuring Sys. Co., 361 U.S. 894 (1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Tatnall Measuring Sys. Co., 361 U.S. 894 (1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a mere agent or depository of the proceeds of an illegal transaction will not be permitted to assert the defense of illegality in an action to recover the proceeds by a party to the illegal transaction.”
14 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Oei v. Citibank, N.A. (nysd, 1997-03-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Oei v. Citibank, N.A.
S.D.N.Y. · 1997 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a mere agent or depository of the proceeds of an illegal transaction will not be permitted to assert the defense of illegality in an action to recover the proceeds by a party to the illegal transaction.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.
v.
Tatnall Measuring Systems Co.
No. 411.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 16, 1959.
361 U.S. 894
Arthur Littleton and Walter J. Blenko for petitioners. Joseph W. Swain, Jr. and Dexter N. Shaw for respondents.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.