green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.8 score
“federal regulation of a field of commerce should not be deemed pre-emptive of state regulatory power in the absence of persuasive reasons - either that the nature of the regulated subject matter permits no other conclusion, or that congress has unmistakenly so ordained”
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Credit Company, and the American Road Insurance Company and Ford Life Insurance Company, and First Nationwide Financial Corporation and First Nationwide Bank v. Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Appeal of Pennsylvania Association of Independent Insurance Agents, Ulrich, John M., Jr., Professional Insurance Agents Association of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware, Inc., Leach, Charles P., Jr., Pennsylvania Association of Life Underwriters and Alexander, Harold E., (Intervening Defendants) in 88-1339. United Services Automobile Association, a Texas Reciprocal Interinsurance Exchange, Usaa Casualty Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance Company, Usaa Life Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance Company, and Usaa Annuity and Life Insurance Comapany, a Texas Stock Insurance v. Muir, William J., Iii, Acting Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Appeal of Pennsylvania Association of Independent Insurance Agents, John Ulrich, Jr., Professional Insurance Agents Association of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware, Inc. Charles P. Leach, Jr., Pennsylvania Association of Life Underwriters and Harold E. Alexander, in 88-5077. United Services Automobile Association, a Texas Reciprocal Interinsurance Exchange, Usaa Casualty Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance Company, Usaa Life Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance Company, and Usaa Annuity and Life Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance v. Muir, William J., Iii, Acting Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Association of Independent Insurance Agents, John Ulrich, Jr., Professional Insurance Agents Association of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware, Inc. Charles P. Leach, Jr., Pennsylvania Association of Life Underwriters and Harold E. Alexander, Intervenors. Appeal of Constance Foster, in 88-5078. United Services Automobile Association, a Texas Reciprocal Interinsurance Exchange, Usaa Casualty Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance Company, Usaa Life Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance Company, and Usaa Annuity and Life Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance v. Muir, William J., Iii, Acting Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Association of Independent Insurance Agents, John Ulrich, Jr., Professional Insurance Agents Association of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware, Inc. Charles P. Leach, Jr. Pennsylvania Association of Life Underwriters and Harold E. Alexander, Plaintiffs/intervenors. Appeal of United Services Automobile Association, Usaa Casualty Insurance Company, Usaa Life Insurance Company, and Usaa Annuity and Life Insurance Company, in 88-5121
federal regulation of a field of commerce should not be deemed pre-emptive of state regulatory power in the absence of persuasive reasons--either that the nature of the regulated subject matter permits no other conclusion, or that congress has unmistakenly so ordained
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Commissioner of Pennsylvania
federal regulation of a field of commerce should not be deemed pre-emptive of state regulatory power in the absence of persuasive reasons - either that the nature of the regulated subject matter permits no other conclusion, or that congress has unmistakenly so ordained
cited
Cited "see"
In Re the Appeal of R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
See Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Reily, 373 U.S. 64 , 83 S.Ct. 1201 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 202 , rehearing denied, 374 U.S. 858 , 83 S.Ct. 1861 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 1082 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hill Manor Apartments v. Brome
See also, Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul, 373 U.S. 132, 141 , 83 S.Ct. 1210 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 248 (1963), reh. den. 374 U.S. 858 , 83 S.Ct. 1861 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 1082 ; Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52 , 61 S.Ct. 399 , 85 L.Ed. 581 (1941). [19] Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul, supra ; New Jersey Guild of Hearing Aid Dispensers v. Long, 75 N.J. 544, 570 (1978); Philadelphia v. Environmental Protec.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Griffin
v.
Maryland
v.
Maryland
No. 26.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1963.
Certiorari, 370 U. S. 935, to the Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Restored to the calendar for reargument, 373 U. S. 920. The motion of petitioners to remove this case from the summary calendar is denied.