green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Commonwealth v. Studebaker
Serio v. United States, 203 F.2d 576, 578 (5th Cir. 1953); United States v. Wapnick, 198 F.Supp. 359, 360 (E.D.N.Y. 1961), aff’d per curiam, 315 F.2d 96 (2 Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S. Ct. 1868 *56 (1965); United States v. Kramer, supra 289 F.2d at 913.
discussed
Cited "see"
Barnett v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
(2×)
See Donato v. United States, 302 F.2d 468, 469-70 (9th Cir.1962) (where claimant alleged that he was summoned to firefighting duty before he had *1163 chance to file intended appeal, court remands to district court for factfinding on "question whether, under all of the circumstances of this case, a relaxation of the exhaustion of remedies rule would be just and proper"), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 828 , 83 S.Ct. 1868 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry P. Hutul, Robert Sacks, Herbert Basan, Nancy Mitchell, and Vito Lombardi
See United States v. Wapnick, 198 F.Supp. 359 (D.C.E.D.N.Y.1961), aff’d. per curiam, 315 F.2d 96 , cert. den. 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1868 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 ; Rios v. United States, 256 F.2d 173 (9th Cir. 1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wapnick v. United States
See United States v. Wapnick, 315 F.2d 96 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1868 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963), rehearing denied, 375 U.S. 871 , 84 S.Ct. 30 , 11 L.Ed.2d 100 (1963) and 383 U.S. 923 , 86 S.Ct. 879 , 15 L.Ed.2d 680 (1966); Wapnick v. United States, 355 F.2d 136 (2d Cir. 1966); Wapnick v. Chappell, 376 F.2d 853 (2d Cir. 1967); Wapnick v. United States, 406 F.2d 741 (2d Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilbur J. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Pedro Perales
See Jamieson v. Folsom, 7 Cir., 1963, 311 F.2d 506 , cert. denied, 374 U.S. 487 , 83 S.Ct. 1868 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1963); Gardner v. Moon, 8 Cir., 1966, 360 F.2d 556, 558 , and Celebrezze v. Lightsey, 5 Cir., 1964, 329 F.2d 780 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
A. A. Hoehling v. Universal City Studios, Inc., and Michael MacDonald Mooney
See, e. g., Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co., 376 U.S. 225 , 83 S.Ct. 1868 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1050 (1964); Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 376 U.S. 234 , 84 S.Ct. 779 , 11 L.Ed.2d 669 (1964).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Satterfield v. Celebrezze
See also Jamieson v. Folsom, 311 F.2d 506 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. den. 374 U.S. 487 , 83 S.Ct. 1868 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1043 , rehearing den. 375 U.S. 871 , 84 S.Ct. 81 , 11 L.Ed.2d 100 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
v.
Stiffel Company
v.
Stiffel Company
No. 1020.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1963.
Will Freeman and Frank H. Marks for petitioner. Warren C. Horton and Max R. Kraus for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.