green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter A. Lisowski
See Sherwin v. United States, 320 F.2d 137, 141 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 964 , 84 S.Ct. 481 , 11 L.Ed.2d 420 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Norman H. Helms v. United States
See Sherwin v. United States, 9 Cir. 1963, 320 F.2d 137 , cert. denied, 375 U.S. 964 , 84 S.Ct. 481 , 11 L.Ed.2d 420 ; Estes v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 335 F.2d 609, 616 ; United States v. Denton, 6 Cir. 1964, 336 F.2d 785, 788 ; compare Edwards v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 334 F.2d 360, 366 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grossman v. United States
Construing a predecessor to section 7121 of the Code, section 3229 of the Revised Statutes, the Supreme Court, in Botany, concluded: We think that Congress intended by the statute to prescribe the exclusive method by which tax cases could be compromised, requiring therefore the concurrence of the Commissioner and the Secretary, and prescribing the formality with which ... it should be attested____When a statute limits a thing to be done in a particular mode, it includes the negative of any other mode. 278 U.S. at 288 , 49 S.Ct. 129 (citations omitted); see also Sherwin v. United States, 320 F.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sherwin
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 519.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 6, 1964.
Richard H. Foster, John V. Lewis and Clifton Hildebrand for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Joseph M. Howard and Lawrence K. Bailey for the United States.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.