discussed Cited "see" United States v. Feaster In this regard it points out that the Supreme Court has "cautioned against a literal reading of congressional labor legislation; such legislation is often the product of conflict and compromise between strongly held and opposed views, and its proper construction frequently requires consideration of its wording against the background of its legislative history and in the light of the general objectives Congress sought to achieve." Wirtz v. Local 153, G.B.B.A., 1968, 389 U.S. 463, 468 , 88 S.Ct. 643, 646 , 19 L.Ed.2d 705, 711 ; accord, Pan American World Airways v. United Brotherhood of Carpente…

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Feaster In this regard it points out that the Supreme Court has “cautioned against a literal reading of congressional labor legislation; such legislation is often the product of conflict and compromise between strongly held and opposed views, and its proper construction frequently requires consideration of its wording against the background of its legislative history and>- in the light of the general objectives Congress sought to achieve.” Wirtz v. Local 153, G.B.B.A., 1968, 389 U.S. 463, 468 , 88 S.Ct. 643, 646 , 19 L.Ed.2d 705, 711 ; accord, Pan American World Airways v. United Brotherhood of Ca…

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Houston H. Feaster, Individually and as Director, Alabama State Docksdepartment (2×) See Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America (9 Cir. 1963) 324 F.2d 217 , cert. den. 376 U.S. 964 , 84 S.Ct. 1122 , 11 L.Ed.2d 982 ; Northwest Airlines v. Jackson (8 Cir. 1950) 185 F.2d 74 ; Walling v. Baltimore Steam Packet Co. (4 Cir. 1944) 144 F.2d 130 ; Allen v. Ocean S.S.