neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.5 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
California
v.
California
No. 5.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 18, 1964.
377 U.S. 926
Solicitor General Cox for the United States., Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, for defendant. Movant pro se., Solicitor General Cox for.the United States in opposition to the motion for leave to file petition for intervention. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and Howard S. Goldin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of California in opposition to motion for leave to file petition for intervention and for leave to file brief as amicus curiae.
Application, Consideration, Motion, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The joint application for an extension of time for filing answering briefs and for allowance of time for filing reply briefs is granted. Answering briefs shall be filed on or before June 15, 1964, and reply briefs shall be filed on or before July 30, 1964. The motion of Carl Whitson for leave to file a petition for intervention is denied but the alternative motion for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application and motion.