Wycoff Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 379 U.S. 7 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Wycoff Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 379 U.S. 7 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Spriggs v. City of San Diego (casd, 2024-10-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Spriggs v. City of San Diego
S.D. Cal. · 2024 · confidence medium
E.g., United States v. Hood, 493 F.2d 677 , 1 680 (9th Cir. 1974) (holding that officer had probable cause to conduct search after shining 2 flashlight into vehicle during a traffic stop and observing “vials of pills in plain view”). 3 Meanwhile, “[p]robable cause to arrest exists when officers have knowledge or 4 reasonably trustworthy information sufficient to lead a person of reasonable caution to 5 believe that an offense has been or is being committed by the person being arrested.” See 6 United States v. Lopez, 482 F.3d 1067, 1072 (9th Cir.2007) (citing Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 7 89…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WYCOFF CO., INC.
v.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAH
No. 238.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1964.
379 U.S. 7
Wayne C. Durham for appellant., A. Pratt Kesler, Attorney General of Utah, H. Wright Volker, Assistant Attorney General, and Keith E. Sohm for appellees.
Published
Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.