D'Andrea v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 379 U.S. 999 (1965). · Go Syfert
Search
D'Andrea v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 379 U.S. 999 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
55 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Clifford Jones v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, Judge of the United States District Court for Thedistrict of Columbia (cadc, 1968-04-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Clifford Jones v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, Judge of the United States District Court for Thedistrict of Columbia (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Levin v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 156 , 164 n. 13, 338 F.2d 265 , 273 n. 13 (1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 999 , 85 S.Ct. 719 , 13 L.Ed.2d 701 (1965); Burgman v. United States, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 184, 188-189 , 188 F.2d 637, 641-642 , cert. denied 342 U.S. 838 , 72 S.Ct. 64 , 96 L.Ed. 1347 (1951).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rosebrock v. Eastern Shore Emergency Physicians, LLC
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2015 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Levin v. United States, 338 F.2d 265, 272 (D.C.Cir.1964) (testimony concerning religious practices not admissible because “the very volitional basis of the activity raises serious questions as to its invariable nature, and hence its probative value”), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 999 , 85 S.Ct. 719 , 13 L.Ed.2d 701 (1965).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Weil v. Seltzer
D.C. Cir. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Levin v. United States, 338 F.2d 265, 272 (D.C.Cir.1964) (testimony concerning religious practices not admissible because "the very volitional basis of the activity raises serious questions as to its invariable nature, and hence its probative value"), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 999 , 85 S.Ct. 719 , 13 L.Ed.2d 701 (1965).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Weil v. Seltzer
D.C. Cir. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Levin v. United States, 338 F.2d 265, 272 (D.C.Cir.1964) (testimony concerning religious practices not admissible because “the very volitional basis of the activity raises serious questions as to its invariable nature, and hence its probative value”), ce rt. denied, 379 U.S. 999 , 85 S.Ct. 719 , 13 L.Ed.2d 701 (1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
D'Andrea
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
No. 673.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 1, 1965.
379 U.S. 999
Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Coz, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome M. Feit for respondent.
Published

. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.