Forster Mfg. Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 380 U.S. 906 (1965). · Go Syfert
Search
Forster Mfg. Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 380 U.S. 906 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “statements inadmissible to prove the truth of what they assert may be admitted if the fact of the assertion is in itself relevant irrespective of its truth.”
20 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. George Jackson and James Jackson (ca7, 1986-01-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. George Jackson and James Jackson
7th Cir. · 1986 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
statements inadmissible to prove the truth of what they assert may be admitted if the fact of the assertion is in itself relevant irrespective of its truth.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Forster Mfg. Co., Inc.
v.
Federal Trade Commission
No. 713.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1965.
380 U.S. 906
Richard A. Tilden for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox for respondent.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.