green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Flowers v. United States
Unless a statute or regulation confers upon a serviceperson the right to reenlist, “an enlisted man has no right to reenlist when his previous enlistment period ends____” McEniry v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 622, 626 (1985) (citing Thompson v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 983, 983-84 , 1979 WL 10425 (1979)); see also Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , 1975 WL 22844 (1975) (stating that the United States Court of Claims has “consistently held that since ... servicemen have no right to reenlist at the expiration of their current enlistments, the United States has undertaken to pay t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Irving Klaw and Jack Kramer
(2×)
See also People v. Mishkin, 26 Misc.2d 152, 154 , 207 N.Y.S.2d 390, 393 (Ct.Spec.Sess.1960), aff’d as modified, 17 A.D.2d 243 , 234 N.Y.S.2d 342 (1st Dept. 1962), aff’d, 15 N.Y.2d 671 , 255 N.Y.S.2d 881 , 204 N.E.2d 209 (1964), probable jurisdiction noted, 380 U.S. 960 , 85 S.Ct. 1103 , 14 L.Ed.2d 152 (1965) (No. 858,1964 Term, renumbered No. 49, 1965 Term).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mishkin
v.
New York
v.
New York
No. 858.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 5, 1965.
Emanuel Red-field for appellant. Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Appeal from Ct. App. N. Y. Probable jurisdiction noted.