green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Peterson
See Whalem v. United States, 346 F2d 812 (DC Cir 1965), cert den 382 US 862 ; United States v. Wright, 627 F2d 1300 (DC Cir 1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Abilene Sheet Metal, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
See Vega v. NLRB, 341 F.2d 576, 577 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 382 U.S. 862 , 86 S.Ct. 123 , 15 L.Ed.2d 100 (1969) (affirming the Board finding of supervisory status and noting “that if the petitioners were not supervisors, the company’s employees were entirely without supervision a large part of the time”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Abilene Sheet Metal, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
See Vega v. NLRB, 341 F.2d 576, 577 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 382 U.S. 862 , 86 S.Ct. 123 , 15 L.Ed.2d 100 (1969) (affirming the Board finding of supervisory status and noting "that if the petitioners were not supervisors, the company's employees were entirely without supervision a large part of the time").
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald F. Larson, United States of America v. Kenneth James Callahan
(2×)
See Lucas v. United States, 343 F.2d 1, 3 (8th Cir.), Cert. denied, 382 U.S. 862 , 86 S.Ct. 125 , 15 L.Ed.2d 100 (1965). 145 The district court's denial of Callahan and Larson's motion to reopen can be interfered with only by a clear showing of abuse of discretion.
cited
Cited "see"
Whalen v. United States
See Whalem v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 331 , 346 F.2d 812 (en banc), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 862 , 86 S.Ct. 124 , 15 L.Ed.2d 100 (1965). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Laudati v. Ternullo
See Whalem v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 331 , 346 F.2d 812 , 818-19 and n. 10, cert. denied, 382 U.S. 862 , 86 S.Ct. 124 , 15 L.Ed.2d 100 (1965); Trest v. United States, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 11 , 350 F.2d 794, 795 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1018 , 86 S.Ct. 634 , 15 L.Ed.2d 532 (1965); Cross v. United States, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 380 , 354 F.2d 512, 513 (1965); United States v. Robertson, 165 U.S.App.D.C. 325 , 507 F.2d 1148, 1157-58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas E. Blunt v. United States
See Whalem v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 331 , 346 F.2d S12, cert. denied, 382 U.S. 862 , 86 S.Ct. 124 , 15 L.Ed.2d 100 (1965), where the court recognized that a hearing could be required although no objection was made to certification of competency. 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walls v. United States
See Lynch v. Overholser, 369 U.S. 705, 719-20 , 82 S.Ct. 1063, 1072 , 8 L.Ed.2d 211 (1962) (where court imposes insanity defense, automatic commitment procedure of D.C.Code § 24-301(d) does not apply, and commitment must be accomplished by civil commitment procedures of Title 21 of the D.C.Code); see also Frendak, supra note 13, 408 A.2d 364 (new criteria for imposing insanity defense, unlike Whalem v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 331, 337 , 346 F.2d 812, 818 (en banc), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 862 , 86 S.Ct. 124 , 15 L.Ed.2d 100 (1965)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Dillon Stores, Division of Dillon Companies, Inc.
See, e. g., Vega v. NLRB, 341 F.2d 576 (1st Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 862 , 86 S.Ct. 123 , 15 L.Ed.2d 100 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bethea v. United States
Compare Whalem v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 331, 337 , 346 F.2d 812, 818 (en banc), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 862 , 86 S.Ct. 124 , 15 L.Ed.2d 100 (1965). 60 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mason
See also Lucas v. United States, 343 F.2d 1, 2-3 (8th Cir., cert. denied, 382 U.S. 862 , 86 S.Ct. 125 , 15 L.Ed.2d 100 (1965) ; 3 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hughes v. United States
Compare Whalem v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 331 , 346 F.2d 812 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 862 , 86 S.Ct. 124 , 15 L.Ed.2d 100 (1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vega
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 218.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1965.
382 U.S. 862
Ginoris Viscarra for petitioners., Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.