green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Poole
(2×)
But see, State v. Unsworth, 240 Or 453, 402 P2d 507 cert den 382 US 1014 (1965), for an apparently contrary ruling in the context of failure to assert subsequently defined constitutional rights.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Maurice McDonald
See White v. United States, 346 F.2d 800, 804 (D.C.Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1014 , 86 S.Ct. 625 , 15 L.Ed.2d 529 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Blalock
See Melton v. People, 157 Colo. 169 , 401 P.2d 605 (1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1014 , 86 S.Ct. 624 , 15 L.Ed.2d 528 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Derosier and Mildred Derosier, D/B/A Northwood Bar
(2×)
See generally Cuevas v. Sdrales, 344 F.2d 1019 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1014 , 86 S.Ct. 625 , 15 L.Ed.2d 528 (1966) ; Miller v. Amusement Enterprises, Inc., 391 F.2d 86, 89-96 (5th Cir. 1967), rev’d en banc, 394 F.2d 342 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Melton v. Patterson
See Melton v. People, 157 Colo. 169 , 401 P.2d 605 (1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1014 , 86 S.Ct. 624 , 15 L.Ed.2d 528 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Lake Oswego v. $23,232.23 in Cash
(2×)
State v. Holmes, 22 Or.App. 23, 29 , 537 P.2d 566 (1975); see also State v. Unsworth, 240 Or. 453, 461 , 402 P.2d 507 (1965), cert den 382 U.S. 1014 , 86 S.Ct. 626 , 15 L.Ed.2d 529 (1966).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Warren
See also, White v. United States, 120 U.S. App.D.C. 319, 346 F.2d 800 (1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1014 , 86 S.Ct. 625 , 15 L.Ed.2d 529 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Christopher
Under similar circumstances, this court (see, People v Rodriguez, 79 AD2d 576 , affd 56 NY2d 557 , supra; see also, People v Esposito, 287 NY 389 , supra) and several Federal courts, interpreting a similar statute ( 18 USC § 4244 ), have held that a defendant does not have a right to seek repeated mental examinations and that the denial of his request for such examinations or to offer expert psychiatric testimony on his mental condition at a hearing, unsupported by legitimate reasons for doing so, does not constitute an abuse of discretion (Ruud v United States, 347 F2d 321, cert denied 382 U…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilkins v. State of Maryland
See also Ruud v. United States, 347 F.2d 321, 323 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1014 , 86 S.Ct. 624 , 15 L.Ed.2d 528 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Perkins
See also White v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 319 , 346 F.2d 800 (1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1014 , 86 S.Ct. 625 , 15 L.Ed.2d 529 (1966); Keiningham v. United States, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 272 , 287 F.2d 126 (1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Melton
v.
Colorado
v.
Colorado
No. 396.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 1966.
Petitioner pro se., Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John P. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Published
Sup. Ct. Colo. Certiorari denied.