Davis v. Cecil, 384 U.S. 915 (1966).

Davis v. Cecil, 384 U.S. 915 (1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

neutral Cited (no substantive treatment) 0.3 score

5 citation events across 3 distinct courts.

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 5

Treatment by court

ca2	0R/0Y/0G	2
cacd	0R/0Y/0G	2
texapp	0R/0Y/0G	1

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

Davis
v.
Cecil, Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals

No. 844.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Apr 25, 1966.

384 U.S. 915

16 L. Ed. 2d 444

86 S. Ct. 1369

1966 U.S. LEXIS 1769

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Petitioner pro se. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Geo. E. Mason, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Cited by 4 opinions | Published

In light of the representations of the Attorney General of Michigan that a copy of the transcript of the United States District Court has been furnished the petitioner, and it appearing from the papers on file that the petitioner has received the relief he sought, the motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.