green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
New York ex rel. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Scenic Hudson Preservation Conf. v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 , 615-16 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966). .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Scenic Hudson Preservation Conf. v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 , 615-16 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966) 2 "Streams which have been used for navigation, or for floating logs or other purposes, have, for many years, been known as highways." In re Burns, 16 A.D. 507, 513 , 44 N.Y.S. 930 (N.Y.App.Div.1897)
discussed
Cited "see"
Devalk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
See Fabert Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 355 F.2d 888, 890-91 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 939 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 539 (1966); Three Rivers Motors Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 522 F.2d 885, 893-94 (3d Cir.1975); Ray Dobbins Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., No. 83-M-10-R, slip op. at 4 n. 3 (W.D.Va.
discussed
Cited "see"
DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
See Fabert Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 355 F.2d 888, 890-91 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 939 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 539 (1966); Three Rivers Motors Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 522 F.2d 885, 893-94 (3d Cir. 1975); Ray Dobbins Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., No. 83-M-10-R, slip op. at 4 n. 3 (W.D.Va.
cited
Cited "see"
Friends of the River v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608, 620-23 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Friends Of The River v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608, 620-23 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966) 32 Order No. 384, 42 FPC 135 at 141 (1969) (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
Escondido Mutual Water Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission, 354 F.2d 608, 620 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1965) (“The Commission has an affirmative duty to inquire into and consider” all facts relevant to the decisionmaking standards imposed by the statutory scheme.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Escondido Mutual Water Company, City of Escondido, and Vista Irrigation District v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians, Secretary of Interior, Etc., Intervenors. San Pasqual, La Jolla, Rincon, Pauma and Pala Bands of Mission Indians v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Escondido Mutual Water Company, City of Escondido and Vista Irrigation District, Intervenors. The Secretary of the Interior, Acting in His Capacity as Trustee for the Rincon, La Jolla and San Pasqual Bands of Mission Indians v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Escondido Mutual Water Company, City of Escondido and Vista Irrigation District, Intervenors
See Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission, 354 F.2d 608, 620 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1965) ("The Commission has an affirmative duty to inquire into and consider" all facts relevant to the decisionmaking standards imposed by the statutory scheme.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Committee on Natural Resources v. Bergland
See Calvert Cliffs’ Coordinating Comm. v. AEC, . . . note 14, 449 F.2d at 1118-19 . * * * “[W]hen the record is deficient, the [agency] may even have a duty to consider issues ignored by the parties.” [Note, “The Use of Generic Rulemaking to Resolve Environmental Issues in Nuclear Power Plant Licensing,” 61 Va.L.Rev. 869, at 891.] In both Calvert Cliffs and Scenic Hudson [Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 , 620-621 (2 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966)], the court pointed out that poorly-financed public interest intervenors may l…
discussed
Cited "see"
Schoeppner v. General Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania
See Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 [2nd Cir. 1965], cert. denied sub nom., 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 [1966]; Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. FCC, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 328 , 359 F.2d 994 [1966]; EEOC v. American Tel. & Tel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Food Handlers Local 425 of the Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, Afl--Cio v. Valmac Industries, Inc.
See National Union Fire Insurance Company, of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. D & L Construction Company, 353 F.2d 169, 174 (8th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 539 (1966); Commercial Standard Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Citizens for Reid State Park v. Laird
See Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission, 354 F.2d 608 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966); hut see Sierra Club v. Hickel, 433 F.2d 24 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. granted sub nom., Sierra Club v. Morton, 401 U.S. 907 , 91 S.Ct. 870 , 27 L.Ed.2d 805 (1971). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Tp. of Hanover v. Town of Morristown
See Scenic Hudson Preservation Conf. v. Federal Power Commission, 354 F. 2d 608 (2 Cir.1965), cert. den. sub nom., Consolidated Edison Co. v. Scenic Hudson Preservation Conf., 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Tennessee Valley Authority
See Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission, 354 F.2d 608 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966); Citizens’ Committee for the Hudson Valley v. Volpe, 425 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1970); Calvert Cliffs’ Coordinating Committee v. Atomic Energy Commission, 449 F.2d 1109 (D.C.Cir., 1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kramer v. Government of Virgin Islands
See Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission, 354 F.2d 608, 615 (C.A.2, 1965), cert. denied, Consolidated Edison Co. of N. Y., Inc. v. Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 5040 (1966)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment Agency
See Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. F. P. C., 354 F.2d 608 , 615-617 (2 Cir. 1965), cert. denied Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966); Office of Communication of United Church of Christ v. F. C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elizabeth Curran v. Ho Sung Kwon, Also Known as Alex Kwon, Revlon International Corporation, Jeremy Foster-Fell
She was not “bereft of the quality of mind essential to the making of a contract.” Kaplan, 182 N.E.2d at 710 ; see also Fabert Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 355 F.2d 888, 891 (7th Cir.) (refusing to invalidate a release in the face of duress claims where the parties have had ready access to counsel), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 939 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 539 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lamoille Valley Railroad v. Interstate Commerce Commission
See also Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 , 620-21 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966). 55 The ICC can probably design conditions that will prevent significant deterioration in transit time on the Maine Central/Canadian National route without seriously burdening Guilford.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lamoille Valley Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc., Robert W. Meserve and Benjamin H. Lacy, Trustees of the Property of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Eastern Magnesia Talc Company, State of Vermont, Intervenors. Providence and Worcester Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc., Robert W. Meserve and Benjamin H. Lacy, Trustees of the Property of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, State of Vermont, Intervenors. State of Vermont v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc., Robert W. Meserve, Intervenors. Canadian National Railway Company, Central Vermont Railway, Inc., Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company and Detroit, Toledo and Ironton Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Robert W. Meserve and Benjamin H. Lacy, Trustees of the Property of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Intervenors
See also Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 , 620-21 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966). 55 144 The ICC can probably design conditions that will prevent significant deterioration in transit time on the Maine Central/Canadian National route without seriously burdening Guilford.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ed Houser Enterprises, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation
See, e. g., Fabert Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 355 F.2d 888 (7th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 939 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 539 (1966); David R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation, Intervenor. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., and Consolidated National Intervenors v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Baltimore Gas and Electric Co., Intervenors
See also Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 , 620-21 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966) (agency duty to develop full record grounded on broad principles of administrative law); Note, supra note 17, 61 Va.L.Rev. at 891: "when the record is deficient, the Commission may even have a duty to consider issues ignored by the parties." In both Calvert Cliffs and Scenic Hudson, the court pointed out that poorly-financed public interest intervenors may lack the wherewithal to marshal technical evidence and bring it to the Commission…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
See also Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 , 620-21 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966) (agency duty to develop full record grounded on broad principles of administrative law); Note, supra note 17, 61 Va.L.Rev. at 891: “when the record is deficient, the Commission may even have a duty to consider issues ignored by the parties.” In both Calvert Cliffs and Scenic Hudson, the court pointed out that poorly-financed public interest intervenors may lack the wherewithal to marshal technical evidence and bring it to the Commis…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trinity Episcopal School Corporation v. Romney
See also, Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. F. P. C., 354 F.2d 608 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. den. sub nom., Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Erwin A. Larose and Jimmy Lee Swaggart v. Federal Communications Commission
See also Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 (2d Cir. 1965), cert, denied sub nom., Consolidated Edison of New York v. Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Transamerican Trailer Transport, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, New York Shipping Association, Inc., and Walleniusrederiena, United Fruit Company, Intervenors. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, New York Shipping Association, Inc., Intervenor. Wolfsburger Transport-Gesellschaft, M.B.H. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, Walleniusrederiena ('Wallenius Line'), Intervenors. New York Shipping Association v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Intervenors. Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, New York Shipping Association, Inc., Intervenor. Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, New York Shipping Association, Inc., Intervenor. Daniels & Kennedy, Inc., and the Madden Corporation v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, New York Shipping Association, Inc., Intervenor
See also Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied sub nom., Consolidated Edison of New York v. Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966); City of Pittsburgh v. FPC, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 113 , 237 F.2d 741 (1956)
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Transamerican Trailer Transport, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission
See also Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied sub nom., Consolidated Edison of New York v. Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966); City of Pittsburgh v. FPC, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 113 , 237 F.2d 741 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arizona Public Service Company v. Federal Power Commission, the People of the State of California, Intervenors
See also Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 455 F.2d 412 , 419 (2d Cir. 1972), where the court stated, with reference to its earlier pre-NEPA decision in Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 (2A Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966) : We commented there: “In this case, as in many others, the Commission has claimed to be the representative of the public interest.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Save Sand Key, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.
See, also, Scenic Hudson Preservation Conf. v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 , 617 (2d Cir.1965), cert. den., 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parker v. United States
See, e. g., Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, Consolidated Edison Co. of New York Inc. v. Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966); Office of Communication of United Church of Christ v. FCC, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 328 , 359 F.2d 994 (1966); Sierra Club v. Hickel, No. 51464 (N.D.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Municipal Electric Ass'n v. Federal Power Commission
Compare Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. F. P. C., 2 Cir., 354 F.2d 608 (1965), cert denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rocky Mountain Power Company v. Federal Power Commission
See also 18 C.F.R. § 4.31 (1967). 29 Petitioner relies on Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F. 2d 608 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966), for the proposition that the Commission had an affirmative duty to ascertain whether the project was economically and financially feasible.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
v.
D & L Construction Co. & Associates
v.
D & L Construction Co. & Associates
No. 1149.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1966.
Douglas Stripp and Landon H. Rowland for petitioner. Rodger John Walsh for respondents.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.