green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Getty v. Carroll County Board of Elections
We stated in In re Legislative Districting of the State, 370 Md. 312, 319 , 805 A.2d 292, 296 (2002), heeding the rationale underlying the “one-person, one-vote” standard, 22 enunciated by the Supreme Court in the landmark decision in Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 , 82 S.Ct. 691 , 7 L.Ed.2d 663 (1962); see also Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 , 84 S.Ct. 1362 , 12 L.Ed.2d 506 (1964) and Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 , 83 S.Ct. 801 , 9 L.Ed.2d 821 (1963), that “a fairly apportioned legislature lies at the very heart of representative democracy.” As such, it is imperative that the rights of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Legislative Redistricting Cases
(2×)
See also Hughes v. Maryland Committee, 241 Md. 471, 498-509 , 217 A.2d 273, 289-295 , cert. denied, 384 U.S. 950 , 86 S.Ct. 1569 , 16 L.Ed.2d 547 (1966) (Barnes, J., dissenting) (discussing at length the importance of the political subdivisions).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Legislative Districting of the State
(2×)
See Maryland, Committee for Fair Representation v. Tawes, supra, 229 Md. at 411-12, 184 A.2d at 717-18; see also Hughes v. Maryland Committee, 241 Md. 471, 498-509 , 217 A.2d 273, 289-295 (Barnes, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 950 , 86 S.Ct. 1569 , 16 L.Ed.2d 547 (1966); see generally Matthew P. Andrews, History of Maryland 617 (1929) (“In the matter of representation Maryland has been likened to a ‘confederacy of counties,’ or a federated republic — the counties and the city of Baltimore ... being comparable to the states in the Federal Union”); Theodore J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bennett
v.
Ford Motor Co.
v.
Ford Motor Co.
No. 1184.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 23, 1966.
Samuel Intrater and Albert Brick for petitioner. William E. Miller and Laidler B. Mackall for respondent.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.