discussed Cited "see" People v. Deborah C. (In re Eric J. (1979) 25 Cal.3d 522, 527 [ 159 Cal.Rptr. 317 , 601 P.2d 549 ]; see People v. Polk (1965) 63 Cal.2d 443 , 449 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 406 P.2d 641 ], cert. den. (1966) 384 U.S. 1010 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 1016 , 86 S.Ct. 1914 ] [interrogation by prosecution psychiatrist]; In re Spencer (1965) 63 Cal.2d 400, 410 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 753 , 406 P.2d 33 ] [court-appointed psychiatrist]; see Estelle v. Smith (1981) 451 U.S. 454, 466-469 [ 68 L.Ed.2d 359, 371-373 , 101 S.Ct. 1866 ] [same].) 1 “‘A private citi zen is not required to advise another individual of his rights before questioning him.

discussed Cited "see" In Re Deborah C. That case concerned "the police" and "the authorities." California courts have limited its requirements (and those of the predecessor case, People v. Dorado (1965) 62 Cal.2d 338 [ 42 Cal. Rptr. 169 , 398 P.2d 361 ], cert. den., 381 U.S. 937 and 946 [ 14 L.Ed.2d 702 and 710, 85 S.Ct. 1765 ]), to "law enforcement officials," their agents, and agents of the court, while the suspect is in official custody. ( In re Eric J. (1979) 25 Cal.3d 522, 527 [ 159 Cal. Rptr. 317 , 601 P.2d 549 ]; see People v. Polk (1965) 63 Cal.2d 443 , 449 [ 47 Cal. Rptr. 1 , 406 P.2d 641 ], cert. den. (1966) 384 U.S. 1010…

cited Cited "see, e.g." Eddie M. Harrison v. United States of America, Orson G. White v. United States Compare People v. Polk, 63 Cal.2d 443 , 47 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 406 P.2d 641 (1965), cert, denied, 384 U.S. 1010 , 86 S.Ct. 1914 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1016 (1966) (Traynor, C.