green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Evans
See Barkan v. United States, 362 F.2d 158 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 882 , 87 S.Ct. 170 , 17 L.Ed.2d 109 (1966) (prior adverse rulings do not reflect bias).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kuntz
“A magistrate’s finding of probable cause is itself a substantial factor tending to uphold the validity of the warrant.” Id.; see also United States v. Freeman, 358 F.2d 459,462 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 882 , 87 S.Ct. 168 , 17 L.Ed.2d 109 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pastor
It was never intended to enable a discontented litigant to oust a judge because of adverse rulings made, for such rulings are reviewable otherwise . . . .” Ex parte American Steel Barrel Co., 230 U.S. 35 , 43-44’, 33 S.Ct. 1007, 1010 , 57 L.Ed. 1379 (1913); see also Barkan v. United States, 362 F.2d 158 (7th Cir. 1966), cert. den. 385 U.S. 882 , 87 S.Ct. 170 , 17 L.Ed.2d 109 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Clarence Hill
Under different facts, the Ninth Circuit decided that physical incorporation of all information into the affidavit was required. “[Ujnder Rule 41(c) the written affidavit presented to the federal issuing officer and to the reviewing court must alone establish that probable cause exists.” United States v. Anderson, 453 F.2d 174, 177 (9th Cir. 1971); accord United States v. Noreikis, 481 F.2d 1177 (7th Cir. 1973) (dictum); United States v. Hatcher, 473 F.2d 321 (6th Cir. 1973) (dictum); United States v. Bailey, 458 F.2d 408 (9th Cir. 1972) (dictum); United States v. Sterling, 369 F.2d 799 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Ex Rel. Alfred Schnitzler v. Harold W. Follette, Warden of Green Haven State Prison, Stormville, New York
(2×)
See also United States v. Freeman, 358 F.2d 459 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 882 , 87 S.Ct. 168 , 17 L.Ed.2d 109 (1966). 18 If, in the present case, we eschew technicalities and approach with commonsense not only the affidavit but the statement of the affiant on which the judge also relied, we should construe the officer's statement as meaning in effect: "There is a basis for believing this informant because an arrest has already been made, thereby proving that the information he supplied is reliable." 19 We find that the showing of probable cause was adequate and therefore reverse the de…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Ramos
See also United States v. Freeman, 358 F.2d 459 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 882 , 87 S.Ct. 168 , 17 L.Ed.2d 109 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America Ex Rel. James Rogers v. Warden of Attica State Prison, Attica, New York
(2×)
See also United States v. Freeman, 358 F.2d 459 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 882 , 87 S.Ct. 168 , 17 L.Ed.2d 168 (1966).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Freeman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 425.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1966.
Theodore Krieger for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.