green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Russom v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
See Brown v. Sterling Aluminum Products Corporation, 365 F.2d 651 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 957 , 87 S.Ct. 1023 , 18 L.Ed.2d 105 (1967) holding that . . . whenever the right sought to be enforced is not uniquely personal to the individual but is a right possessed by the bargaining unit as a whole, only the Union as the sole representative of that unit would normally have the standing to enforce the right.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bradley v. Indiana State Election Board
Even if the defendants were able to attack the Act on a Tenth Amendment ground—an uncertain prospect, it appears, see Katzenbach, 383 U.S. at 323-24 , 86 S.Ct. at 816 ; see also United States v. Louisiana, 265 F.Supp. 703 (E.D.La.1966), aff'd, 386 U.S. 270 , 87 S.Ct. 1023 , 18 L.Ed.2d 39 (1967)—such a claim at this phase would be premature.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berard v. General Motors Corp.
See also Brown v. Sterling Aluminum Products Corp., 365 F.2d 651, 657 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 957 , 87 S.Ct. 1023 , 18 L.Ed.2d 105 , rehearing denied, 386 U.S. 1027 , 87 S.Ct. 1370 , 18 L.Ed.2d 471 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Torres v. Sachs
See e. g., Puerto Rican Organization for Political Action v. Kusper, 350 F.Supp. 606 (N.D.Ind.1972), aff'd 490 F.2d 575 (7th Cir. 1973), United States v. Louisiana, 265 F.Supp. 703 (E.D.La.1966), aff 'd without opinion, 386 U. S. 270 , 87 S.Ct. 1023 , 18 L.Ed.2d 39 (1967), and United States v. Post, 297 F.Supp. 46 (W.D.La.1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ALTERMAN TRANSPORT LINES, INC.
v.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF TENNESSEE
v.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF TENNESSEE
No. 942.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 13, 1967.
J. G. Lackey, Jr., for appellants., George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, Milton P. Rice, Assistant Attorney General, and Seymour Samuels, Jr., for appellees.
Noted, Should, Stewart.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
. Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.