Daugherty v. California, 386 U.S. 271 (1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Daugherty v. California, 386 U.S. 271 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Navarrette-Dominguez (ca10, 2001-01-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Navarrette-Dominguez
10th Cir. · 2001 · confidence medium
Defendant’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 264 , 87 S.Ct. 1032 , 18 L.Ed.2d 40 *861 (1967), challenging the sentence enhancements.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Danny Dixon
7th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 264 , 87 S.Ct. 1032 , 18 L.Ed.2d 40 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DAUGHERTY
v.
CALIFORNIA
No. 19.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 13, 1967.
386 U.S. 271
Pétitioner pro- se., Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and C. Anthony Collins, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Ante, California, Certiorari, Stated.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam. '

The motion for leave to proceed in Jorma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of. Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.