green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.0 score
“once the secret is out, the rest of the world may well have a right to copy it at will; but this should not protect the misappropriator or his privies.”
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
People v. Street
(See, e.g., Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U. S. 131 , supra; Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U. S. 536 , supra; Carlson v. California, 310 U. S. 106 , supra; Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U. S. 88, 101-106 ; Stromberg v. California, 283 U. S. 359 , supra; O’Brien v. United States, 376 F. 2d 538 , supra; but cf. United States v. Miller, 367 F. 2d 72 , cert. den. 386 U. S. 911 , supra.) On the other hand, if the State can show that the prohibition of certain conduct is designed to promote the public health, safety or well-being, then, “ the circumstance that such prohibition has an impact on speech or expressio…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line Communication Services, Inc.
once the secret is out, the rest of the world may well have a right to copy it at will; but this should not protect the misappropriator or his privies.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Carmon
(2×)
See State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69, 78-79 , 150 S.E.2d 1, 8 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 911 , 87 S.Ct. 860 , 17 L.Ed.2d 784 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Buckom
See State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69, 79 , 150 S.E.2d 1, 9 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 911 , 17 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Avco Corporation v. Precision Air Parts, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Underwater Storage, Inc. v. United States Rubber Co., 371 F.2d 950 (D.C.Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 911 , 87 S.Ct. 859 , 17 L.Ed.2d 784 (1967), on remand 314 F.Supp. 546 (D.D.C.1970); Anaconda Co. v. Metric Tool & Die Co., 485 F.Supp. 410, 426 (E.D.Pa.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Price
See State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69 , 150 S.E. 2d 1 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 911 (1967). *452 Lastly, on redirect examination, defendant was asked whether he had heard from his sister, Mrs. Williams, on the afternoon of 22 May 1979 concerning Mrs. Cashwell.
cited
Cited "see"
Anaconda Co. v. Metric Tool & Die Co.
See Underwater Storage, Inc. v. United States Rubber Co., 125 U.S.App.D.C. 297, 301 , 371 F.2d 950, 954 (D.C.Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 911 , 87 S.Ct. 859 , 17 L.Ed.2d 784 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Telex Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
See Underwater Storage, Inc. v. United States Rubber Co., 125 U.S.App.D.C. 297 , 371 F.2d 950 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 911 , 87 S.Ct. 859 , 17 L.Ed.2d 784 (1967); Koehring Co. v. National Automatic Tool Co., supra. But compare Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., 407 F.2d 288 (9th Cir. 1969); Shatterproof Glass Corp. v. Guardian Glass Co., 322 F.Supp. 854 (E.D.Mich.1970), aff’d, 462 F.2d 1115 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1039 , 93 S.Ct. 518 , 34 L.Ed.2d 487 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Frank G. Fenix and Jessie P. Fenix v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
See Ford v. Boeger, 362 F.2d 999, 1006-1007 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 914 , 87 S.Ct. 857 , 17 L.Ed.2d 787 (1967); Kern v. Prudential Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Glue-Fold, Inc. v. Slautterback Corp.
Compare Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., 407 F.2d 288 (CA9, 1969) (not a continuing wrong under California law—limitation period upon all recovery begins upon initial misappropriation) with Underwater Storage, Inc. v. U.S. Rubber Co., 371 F.2d 950 (CADC, 1966), cert. den., 386 U.S. 911 [ 87 S.Ct. 859 , 17 L.Ed.2d 784 ] (1967) (continuing wrong under general principles—limitation period with respect to a specific act of misappropriation begins at the time that the act of misappropriation occurs).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Modeste v. Local 1199, Drug, Hospital & Health Care Employees Union
See, e.g., Ford v. Boeger, 362 F.2d 999 (8th Cir.1966), cert, denied, 386 U.S. 914 , 87 S.Ct. 857 , 17 L.Ed.2d 787 reh’g denied, 386 U.S. 978 , 87 S.Ct. 1160 , 18 L.Ed.2d 140 (1967); Suffolk Const. Co. v. United Bhd. of Carpenters, 736 F.Supp. 1179 (D.Mass.1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rudolph
App. 465 , 206 S.E. 2d 729 (1974); see also State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69 , 150 S.E. 2d 1 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 911 , 87 S.Ct. 860 , 17 L.Ed. 2d 784 (1967).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Vestal
See also State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69 , 150 S.E. 2d 1 , cert. den., 386 U.S. 911 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marshall
v.
Russell
v.
Russell
No. 874.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 13, 1967.
Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.