Woody v. Sterling Aluminum Prods., Inc., 386 U.S. 957 (1967). · Go Syfert
Woody v. Sterling Aluminum Prods., Inc., 386 U.S. 957 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
52 citation events across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Laing v. Fidelity Broadcasting Corp. (fladistctapp, 1983-07-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Laing v. Fidelity Broadcasting Corp.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Collins v. Government of Virgin Islands, 366 F.2d 279 (3d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 958 , 87 S.Ct. 1026 , 18 L.Ed.2d 105 (1967) where the co-defendant, Benjamin, filed a demand, while the co-defendant Government did not.
discussed Cited "see" Fields Engineering & Equipment, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc.
8th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2332; see Collins v. Government of the Virgin Islands, 366 F.2d 279 , 286 (3d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 958 , 87 S.Ct. 1026 , 18 L.Ed.2d 105 (1967).
cited Cited "see" Drakatos v. R. B. Denison, Inc.
D. Conn. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Collins v. Government of Virgin Islands, 366 F.2d 279 , 284 (3d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 958 , 87 S.Ct. 1026 , 18 L.Ed.2d 105 (1967); 5 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 38.45 (2d ed. 1979).
cited Cited "see" Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
E.D. Pa. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Collins v. Government of the Virgin Islands, 366 F.2d 279 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 386 U.S. 958 , 87 S.Ct. 1026 , 18 L.Ed.2d 105 (1966).
discussed Cited "see" Cannon v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Company
S.D.N.Y. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
Accordingly, we hold that the application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel was not appropriate in view of the particular circumstances presented by this case and that the district court erred in granting summary judgment on the issue of liability.” (Id. at 9,12.) (Footnote omitted.) Plaintiffs and plaintiff-intervenors have demanded a trial by jury on all issues in accordance with Rule 38, F.R.Civ.P., and defendants are entitled to rely on this demand since “ [a] demand for a trial by jury made as herein provided may not be withdrawn without the consent of the parties.” Rule 38(d),…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Arif v. AT&T CORP.
E.D. Ark. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Woody v. Sterling Aluminum Prod., Inc., 244 F.Supp. 84, 90 (E.D.Mo. 1965), aff'd, 365 F.2d 448 (8th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 957 , 87 S.Ct. 1026 , 18 L.Ed.2d 105 (1967), reh’g denied, 386 U.S. 1027 , 87 S.Ct. 1371 , 18 L.Ed.2d 471 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Woody
v.
Sterling Aluminum Products, Inc.
No. 946.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 13, 1967.
386 U.S. 957
Jerome J. Duff for petitioners^ Daniel Bartlett and William Stix for Sterling Aluminum Products, Inc., and Donald S. Siegel for' International Association of Machinists et al., respondents.
Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.