Potter v. California, 388 U.S. 924 (1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Potter v. California, 388 U.S. 924 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
616 citation events (425 in the last 25 years) across 54 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Dutton (pasuperct, 1971-11-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Commonwealth v. Dutton
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1971 · confidence medium
The attorney has a second choice available to him, however. “[I]f counsel finds his case to be wholly frivolous, after a conscientious examination of it, he should so advise the court and request permission to withdraw.” 388 U.S. at 744.
cited Cited "see" Diaunte Shields v. United States
7th Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cir. Rule 51(b), addressing motions to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Irving, R.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. California, 388 U.S. 924 (1967).
discussed Cited "see" Christopher David Ryan v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 , reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 1 Ryan v. State, No. 08-06-00016-CR, 2007 WL 2457582 (Tex.App.--El Paso Aug. 30, 2007, pet. ref’d)(not designated for publication). 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.Crim.App. [panel op.] 1978)(adopting the Anders procedure); see also Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 , 509–11 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991).
discussed Cited "see" Patrick De La Cruz Moreno v. State
Tex. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 , reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.Crim.App. [panel op.] 1978)(adopting the Anders procedure); see also Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991).
discussed Cited "see" Johnny Lee Molder, Jr. v. State
Tex. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 , reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.Crim.App. [panel op.] 1978)(adopting the Anders procedure); see also Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Thomas
La. Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 *242 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), rehearing denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), 704 So.2d 241, 242 ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), 653 So.2d 1176 ; and State v. Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 (La.App. 4th Cir.1990).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hunter
La. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), reh’g denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), 704 So.2d 241 ; State v. Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990); and State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96) , 676 So.2d 1108 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Dilks
La. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), reh’g denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), 704 So.2d 241 ; State v. Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990); and State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96) , 676 So.2d 1108 .
cited Cited "see" Rodriguez v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 , reh’g denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967).
cited Cited "see" Wilkes v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 , reh'g denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967).
cited Cited "see" Robinson v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 , reh'g denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967).
cited Cited "see" Braggs v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 , reh’g denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967).
cited Cited "see" State v. Washington
N.C. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 , reh'g denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967).
discussed Cited "see" Cutbirth v. State (2×)
Wyo. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 , reh. denied 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967); Entsminger v. Iowa, 386 U.S. 748 , 87 S.Ct. 1402 , 18 L.Ed.2d 501 (1967).
discussed Cited "see" Loop v. Solem
S.D. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), reh’g denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 ; United States v. Edwards, 111 F.2d 364 (7th Cir.1985); Cannon v. Berry, 727 F.2d 1020 (11th Cir. 1984); Mylar v. State of Alabama, 671 F.2d 1299 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1229 , 103 S.Ct. 3570 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1411 ; Perez v. Wainwright, 640 F.2d 596 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1759 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 , reh’g denied, 456 U.S. 985 , 102 S.Ct. 2260 , 72 L.Ed.2d 864 ; Robinson v. Wyrick, 635 F.2d 757 (8th Cir…
discussed Cited "see" In Re the Tax Appeal of O.W. Ltd. Partnership
Haw. App. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sullivan v. United States, 363 F.2d 724 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 905 , 87 S. Ct. 1683 , 18 L.Ed.2d 622 (1967), reh’g denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S. Ct. 2104 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1378 (1967); 3 S. Gard, Jones on Evidence § 16:17 (6th ed. 1972); 30 Am.
cited Cited "see" DePuy v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S. Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 , reh. den. 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mike Hernandez v. George F. Denton (2×)
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 , 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 reh’g denied, 388 U.S. 924 , 87 S.Ct. 2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967) (discussing in a different context that a contention is not frivolous if “any of the legal points [are] arguable on their merits”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Potter
v.
California
No. 514.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 1967.
388 U.S. 924
William A. Dougherty for petitioners., Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and James H. Kline, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Cited by 75 opinions  |  Published

Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion for leave to supplement petition granted. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.