Oppenheim v. Sterling, 388 U.S. 925 (1967). · Go Syfert
Oppenheim v. Sterling, 388 U.S. 925 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“he picking and choosing involved in the selection process is the very essence of a discretionary function”
12 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bosco v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (txnd, 1985-04-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Bosco v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
N.D. Tex. · 1985 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he picking and choosing involved in the selection process is the very essence of a discretionary function
discussed Cited "see" Martinez v. United States
W.D. Tex. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lipka v. U.S., 369 F.2d 288 , 291 (2d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 935 , 87 S.Ct. 2061 , 18 L.Ed.2d 997 , reh’g denied, 388 U.S. 925 , 87 S.Ct. 2129 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1381 (1967); Strangi v. U.S., 211 F.2d 305 (5th Cir.1954); Kropp v. Douglas Aircraft Co., 329 F.Supp. 447 (E.D.N.Y.1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oppenheim
v.
Sterling Lipka, Administratrix v. United States Blanchard, dba Inferno Co. v. Texsteam Corp. Bryans v. United States
No. 1324; No. 1411; No. 1597; No. 1623.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 1967.
388 U.S. 925

Opinion text not yet available. Try Google Scholar