Vela v. Beto, 389 U.S. 1025 (1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Vela v. Beto, 389 U.S. 1025 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Anderson (utah, 1980-05-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Anderson (2×)
Utah · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725 (2nd Cir.1966), cert. granted, 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed.2d 872 , cert. dismissed, 389 U.S. 80 , 19 L.Ed.2d 255 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , reh. denied, 389 U.S. 1025 , 88 S.Ct. 583 , 19 L.Ed.2d 675 (1967).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Petition to Compel Testimony of Tuso
N.J. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725, 730 (2 Cir.1966), cert. granted 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed. 2d 872 (1967), dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 255 , reh. den. 389 U.S. 1025 , 88 S.Ct. 583 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 675 (1967); United States v. Payton, 363 F. 2d 996, 999-1000 (2 Cir.1966) (Friendly, J., dissenting); United States v. Arcuri, 282 F. Supp. 347, 349 (E.D.N.Y. 1968), aff'd 405 F. 2d 691 (2 Cir.1968), cert. den. 395 U.S. 913 , 89 S.Ct. 1760 , 23 L.Ed. 2d 227 (1969) (holding that an indictment based solely on hearsay evidence would be …
discussed Cited "see" Tyler v. Parks
E.D. Mo. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Marchese, 341 F.2d 782 (9th Cir. 1965) cert. denied 389 U.S. 930 , 88 S.Ct. 294 , 19 L.Ed.2d 283 , reh. denied 389 U.S. 1025 , 88 S.Ct. 585 , 19 L.Ed.2d 674 ; Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 785 , 17 L.Ed.2d 690 (1967); Walker v. Bishop, 295 F.Supp. 767 (D.C.Ark.1967).
cited Cited "see" Mora Et Al. v. McNamara, Secretary of Defense, Et Al.
SCOTUS · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See 389 U.S. 1025 , 88 S.Ct. 584 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vela
v.
Beto, Corrections Director
No. 58.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 18, 1967.
389 U.S. 1025
Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, R. L. Lattimore, Howard M. Fender and Lonny F. Zwiener, Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for respondent.
Douglas, Whom.
Published

Lead Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Dissent

The Chief Justice, with whom Mr. Justice Douglas joins,

dissenting.

This case is another further extension of Spencer v. Texas, 385 U. S. 554, in which the error is more egregious. For the reasons stated in my concurring opinion in Burgett v. Texas, ante, p. 116, 1 would grant the petition for writ of certiorari.