Am. Com. Lines, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville R.R., 389 U.S. 1032 (1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Am. Com. Lines, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville R.R., 389 U.S. 1032 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kelly v. Wyman (nysd, 1968-05-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kelly v. Wyman
S.D.N.Y. · 1968 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Thompson v. Shapiro, 270 F.Supp. 331 (D.Conn.1967), prob. juris, noted, 389 U.S. 1032 , 88 S.Ct. 784 , 19 L.Ed.2d 820 (Jan. 15, 1968); Smith v. King, 277 F. Supp. 31 (M.D.Ala.1967), prob. juris, noted, 390 U.S. 903 , 88 S.Ct. 821 , 19 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Burns v. Montgomery
N.D. Cal. · 1968 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Thompson v. Shapiro, 270 F.Supp. 331 (D.Conn.1967), probable jurisdiction noted, Shapiro v. Thompson, 389 U.S. 1032 , 88 S.Ct. 784 , 19 L.Ed.2d 820 (1968). 3.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
American Commercial Lines, Inc.
v.
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. American Waterways Operators, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.
No. 797; No. 804; No. 808; No. 809.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 15, 1968.
389 U.S. 1032
T. Randolph Buck, Robert E. Webb, J. Raymond Clark and Harry C. Ames, Jr., for appellants in No. 797; Peter T. Beardsley, Bryce Rea, Jr., and Thomas M. Knebel for appellants in No. 804; A. Alvis Layne and Robert L. Wright for appellant in No. 808; and Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn and Leonard S. Goodman for appellant in No. 809., Stanfield Johnson, Elbert R. Leigh, James H. Mc-Glothlin, James A. Bistline, Thormund A. Miller, William M. Maloney, Harry J. Breithaupt, Donal L. Turkal, Carl Helmetag, Jr., Joseph E. Stopher and R. Lee Blackwell for appellee railroads., Solicitor General Griswold filed a memorandum for the United States in all four cases.
Published

Appeal from D. C. W. D. Ky. Probable jurisdiction noted. Cases are consolidated and two hours allotted for oral argument.

Reported below: 268 F. Supp. 71.