Bogart v. State Bar of California, 390 U.S. 37 (1968). · Go Syfert
Bogart v. State Bar of California, 390 U.S. 37 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States of America Ex Rel. James Ellis Foye v. State of New Jersey and Ronald Groomes, Superintendent New Jersey State Prison (ca3, 1977-01-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States of America Ex Rel. James Ellis Foye v. State of New Jersey and Ronald Groomes, Superintendent New Jersey State Prison
3rd Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Funicello, 49 N.J. 553, 583 , 231 A.2d 579, 596 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 911 , 88 S.Ct. 837 , 19 L.Ed.2d 882 (1968), and cases cited therein.
discussed Cited "see" In Re Bogart (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Bogart v. The State Bar of California, 390 U.S. 37 , 88 S.Ct. 837 , 19 L.Ed.2d 814 *129 (1968) where the appeal was dismissed and certiorari denied and also Bogart v. California, 392 U.S. 298 , 88 S.Ct. 2070 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1968), appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Parole Application of Trantino
N.J. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Funicello, 49 N.J. 553 (1967), cert. den., 390 U.S. 911 , 88 S.Ct. 837 , 19 L.Ed.2d 882 (1968) (defendant killed a used car dealer by repeatedly stabbing and slashing him and then drove off with a car); State v. Billingsley, 46 N.J. 219 (1966) (defendant, while intoxicated, killed two women by beating and repeatedly stabbing them); State v. Forcella, 35 N.J. 168 (1961), cert. den. 369 U.S. 866 , 82 S.Ct. 1035 , 8 L.Ed.2d 86 (1962) (quarrel between former lovers ended with apparently intoxicated defendant shooting his lover to death at close range with a shotgun).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BOGART
v.
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
No. 806.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 1968.
390 U.S. 37
Peter D. Bogart, appellant, pro se., Homer I. Mitchell and F. La Mar Forshee for appellees.
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.