Roberts v. Warden, 390 U.S. 196 (1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Roberts v. Warden, 390 U.S. 196 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see, e.g." William H. Fuller v. United States (4×)
D.C. Cir. · 1969 · signal: compare · confidence low
We need not consider whether the evidentiary rule, which has been reevaluated to the extent that it permits consecutive punishments, may, also be in process of reevaluation to the extent that it limits the plea of double jeopardy, see Abbate v. United States, 359 U.S. 187, 196 , 79 S.Ct. 666 , 3 L.Ed.2d 729 (1959) (separate opinion of Brennan, J.); United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 (1966); compare Robison v. United States, 390 U.S. 198 , 88 S.Ct. 903 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1040 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ROBERTS
v.
WARDEN, MARYLAND PENITENTIARY
No. 950.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 4, 1968.
390 U.S. 196
Published
Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.