green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Air Transport Association of America, Transamerica Airlines, Inc., Intervenors
See Transcontinental Bus Sys. v. CAB, 383 F.2d 466 , 480 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 850 , 19 L.Ed.2d 979 (1968); Diefenthal v. CAB, 681 F.2d 1039 (5th Cir.1982) 35 Crescent Express Lines v. United States, 49 F.Supp. 92 (S.D.N.Y.) (3-judge panel), aff'd, 320 U.S. 401 , 64 S.Ct. 167 , 88 L.Ed. 127 (1943) 36 The bill as drafted by the Federal Coordinator of Transportation did not contain the proviso.
cited
Cited "see"
Action on Smoking & Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board
See Transcontinental Bus Sys. v. CAB, 383 F.2d 466 , 480 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 850 , 19 L.Ed.2d 979 (1968); Diefenthal v. CAB, 681 F.2d 1039 (5th Cir.1982). .
cited
Cited "see"
Illinois Consolidated Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce Commission
See Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board (5th Cir. 1967), 383 F.2d 466 , 480, cert. denied (1968), 390 U.S. 920 , 19 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Trailways of New England, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
(2×)
See Miller v. United States, 9 Cir., 1967, 388 F.2d 973 . 14 We conclude that the petitioners here amply stated a prima facie case of rate discrimination, just as did the petitioner with respect to military and youth fares in Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. CAB, 5 Cir., 1967, 383 F.2d 466 , cert. denied 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 850 , 19 L.Ed.2d 979 , the case on which petitioners principally rely.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jollie v. State
See also Seaboard Air Line R.R. v. Williams, 199 So.2d 469 (Fla. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 851 , 19 L.Ed.2d 979 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sanders v. Air India
See also Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. CAB, 383 F.2d 466 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 850 , 19 L.Ed.2d 979 (1968) (Section 404(b) provides “that airline traffic, both passenger and cargo traffic, is to be treated equally by the air carriers. [It *1376 is] designed to insure that rates and services are offered on an equal basis to all who seek to use the air carriers. [It is] intended to protect the traveling public . . . .” Id. at 474-75.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wirtz, Secretary of Labor
v.
Hotel, Motel & Club Employees Union, Local 6
v.
Hotel, Motel & Club Employees Union, Local 6
No. 891.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 29, 1968.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Louis F. Claiborne, Alan S. Rosenthal, Robert V. Zener, Charles Donahue and George T. Avery for petitioner. Sidney E. Cohn for respondent.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 24 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.