green
Positive treatment
7.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Air Transport Association of America, Transamerica Airlines, Inc., Intervenors
See Transcontinental Bus Sys. v. CAB, 383 F.2d 466 , 480 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 850 , 19 L.Ed.2d 979 (1968); Diefenthal v. CAB, 681 F.2d 1039 (5th Cir.1982) 35 Crescent Express Lines v. United States, 49 F.Supp. 92 (S.D.N.Y.) (3-judge panel), aff'd, 320 U.S. 401 , 64 S.Ct. 167 , 88 L.Ed. 127 (1943) 36 The bill as drafted by the Federal Coordinator of Transportation did not contain the proviso.
cited
Cited "see"
Action on Smoking & Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board
See Transcontinental Bus Sys. v. CAB, 383 F.2d 466 , 480 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 850 , 19 L.Ed.2d 979 (1968); Diefenthal v. CAB, 681 F.2d 1039 (5th Cir.1982). .
cited
Cited "see"
Illinois Consolidated Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce Commission
See Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board (5th Cir. 1967), 383 F.2d 466 , 480, cert. denied (1968), 390 U.S. 920 , 19 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Taxation With Representation of Washington v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary of the Treasury
(2×)
See Avins v. Rutgers, State Univ. of New Jersey, 385 F.2d 151 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 855 , 19 L.Ed.2d 982 (1968) (state university law review had editorial prerogative of rejecting article).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald E. Muir, H. Jeff Buttram, and O. Navarro Faircloth, Plaintiffs v. Alabama Educational Television Commission Jacob Walker, Etc.
(2×)
See Avins v. Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, 385 F.2d 151 (3rd Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 855 , 19 L.Ed.2d 982 (1968), and Advocates for the Arts v. Thomson, 532 F.2d 792 (1st Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 254 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Business Executives' Move for Vietnam Peace v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Post-Newsweek Stations, Capital Area, Inc., Intervenor. Democratic National Committee v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. And Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., Intervenors
See Avins v. Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, 3 Cir., 385 F.2d 151 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 855 , 19 L.Ed.2d 982 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Business Executives' Move for Vietnam Peace v. Federal Communications Commission
See Avins v. Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, 3 Cir., 385 F.2d 151 (1967), cert, denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 855 , 19 L.Ed.2d 982 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Seattle First National Bank v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
See NLRB v. Int'l Hod Carriers, etc., Local No. 1082, 384 F.2d 55 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 853 , 19 L.Ed.2d 980 (1967). 25 I do not say that financial impact is not important.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. C. H. Sprague & Son Co., and Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers Local Union 633, Intervenor
See NLRB v. Strong, 386 F.2d 929, 931 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 853 , 19 L.Ed.2d 980 (1968), rev’d, 393 U.S. 357 , 89 S.Ct. 541 , 21 L.Ed.2d 546 (1969); NLRB v. Ritchie Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Louisiana Bunkers, Inc., and Surprise, Inc., Successor to Patterson Menhaden Corp.
See NLRB v. Strong, 9 Cir. 1967, 386 F.2d 929, 930-931 , cert. denied, 1968, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 853 , 19 L.Ed.2d 980 ; NLRB v. Albritton Eng’r Corp., 5 Cir. 1965, 340 F.2d 281, 285 ; NLRB v. White Constr. & Eng’r Co., 5 Cir. 1963, 204 F.2d 950, 952-953 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Trailways of New England, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
(2×)
See Miller v. United States, 9 Cir., 1967, 388 F.2d 973 . 14 We conclude that the petitioners here amply stated a prima facie case of rate discrimination, just as did the petitioner with respect to military and youth fares in Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. CAB, 5 Cir., 1967, 383 F.2d 466 , cert. denied 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 850 , 19 L.Ed.2d 979 , the case on which petitioners principally rely.
discussed
Cited "see"
Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Local 3-89 Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Union Carbide Corporation, Intervenor
See, NLRB v. International Hod Carriers, 384 F.2d 55 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 853 , 19 L.Ed.2d 980 (1968); NLRB v. Muskegon Bricklayers Union No. 5, 378 F.2d 859 (6th Cir. 1967); Houchens Market of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. NLRB, 375 F.2d 208 (6th Cir. 1967); NLRB v. American Compress Warehouse, Division of Frost-Whited Co., 350 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 982 , 86 S.Ct. 558 , 15 L.Ed.2d 472 (1966); Philip Carey Mfg.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jollie v. State
See also Seaboard Air Line R.R. v. Williams, 199 So.2d 469 (Fla. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 851 , 19 L.Ed.2d 979 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sanders v. Air India
See also Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. CAB, 383 F.2d 466 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 850 , 19 L.Ed.2d 979 (1968) (Section 404(b) provides “that airline traffic, both passenger and cargo traffic, is to be treated equally by the air carriers. [It *1376 is] designed to insure that rates and services are offered on an equal basis to all who seek to use the air carriers. [It is] intended to protect the traveling public . . . .” Id. at 474-75.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Transcontinental Bus System, Inc.
v.
Civil Aeronautics Board
v.
Civil Aeronautics Board
No. 818.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 29, 1968.
Howard S. Boros and Robert C. Lester for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Joseph B. Goldman, O. D. Ozment, Warren L. Sharf-man and Robert L. Toomey for respondent. Frederick S. Hill for National Association of Motor Bus Owners, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.