green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.0 score
“documents submitted incident to a letter of credit are to be strictly construed”
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Courtaulds North America, Inc. v. North Carolina National Bank, a National Banking Association
But see Banco Espanol de Credito v. State Street Bank & Trust Co., 385 F.2d 230, 234 (1 Cir. 1967), cert. denied 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 (1968).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Exotic Traders Far East Buying Office v. Exotic Trading U.S.A., Inc.
documents submitted incident to a letter of credit are to be strictly construed
discussed
Cited "see"
Boston Hides & Furs, Ltd. v. Sumitomo Bank, Ltd.
The inconsistent trailer numbers were a “technical variance,” Exotic Traders, 717 F.Supp. at 16 ; See Banco Espanol de Credito v. State Street Bank & Trust Co., 385 F.2d 230 (1st Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 (1968); Flagship Cruises, 569 F.2d at 705 , regarding a matter which was not required under the terms of the Letter of Credit and which could not mislead the Banks to their detriment. 4 The Banks’ principal argument is that, “if the ‘marks and numbers’ identifying the goods on the [Presentment Bills of Lading] did not match the ‘mark…
discussed
Cited "see"
Colgate Palmolive Company v. S/s Dart Canada, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., Dart Containerline Ltd., Global Terminal & Container Services, Inc., Lansdell Protective Agency, Inc., Global Terminal & Container Services, Inc., Lansdell Protective Agency, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Third-Party
Accord, Carle & Montanari, Inc. v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, 275 F.Supp. 76 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem. 386 F.2d 839 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 162 (1968). 7 Having said that nothing in COGSA or its legislative history precludes parties from agreeing to extend its coverage to situations other than those where it would normally apply, it does not follow that any such resulting contractual provision is necessarily valid.
discussed
Cited "see"
Colgate Palmolive Co. v. S/S Dart Canada
Accord, Carle & Montanari, Inc. v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, 275 F.Supp. 76 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d mem. 386 F.2d 839 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 162 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Cuvrell (In Re F & T Contractors, Inc.)
See Banco Espanol de Credito v. State Street Bank and Trust Company, 385 F.2d 230 (1st Cir. 1967) cert. den. 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 ; Dynamics Corporation of America v. Citizens and Southern National Bank, 356 F.Supp. 991 (N.D.Ga.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bossier Bank & Trust Company v. Union Planters National Bank Of Memphis
See Banco Espanol de Credito v. State Street Bank and Trust Company, 385 F.2d 230 (1st Cir. 1967) cert. den. 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 ; Dynamics Corporation of America v. Citizens and Southern National Bank, 356 F.Supp. 991 (N.D.Ga.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bossier Bank & Trust Co. v. Union Planters National Bank
See Banco Espanol de Credito v. State Street Bank and Trust Company, 385 F.2d 230 (1st Cir. 1967) cert. den. 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 163 ; Dynamics Corporation of America v. Citizens and Southern National Bank, 356 F.Supp. 991 (N.D.Ga.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Toyomenka, Inc. v. S. S. Tosaharu Maru
See Carle & Montanari, Inc. v. American Export Inbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 275 F.Supp. 76 (S.D.N.Y.) aff’d, 386 F.2d 839 (2d Cir. 1967), cert denied, 390 U.S. 1013 , 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 162 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Royal Typewriter Co., Div. of Litton Bs v. M/V Kulmerland
See Carle & Montanari, Inc. v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, 275 F.Supp. 76 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d 386 F.2d 839 (2d Cir., 1967), cert. den. 390 Ü.S. 1013, 88 S.Ct. 1263 , 20 L.Ed.2d 162 (1968) ; Bernard Screen Printing Corp. v. Meyer Line, etc., 328 F.Supp. 288 (S.D.N.Y., 1971), aff’d 464 F.2d 934 (2d Cir., 1972). 7 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State Street Bank & Trust Co.
v.
Banco Espanol de Credito
v.
Banco Espanol de Credito
No. 1155.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 8, 1968.
John M. Hall and Charles F. Choate for petitioner. Charles C. Cabot for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (1)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.