green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Zola v. Kelley
See State v. Cote, 108 N.H. 290, 297 (1967) (“prior convictions have an inherent prejudicial effect and are admitted to impeach the [criminal] defendant’s credibility only because the possibility of prejudice resulting from their introduction in evidence is thought to be outweighed by the legitimate purpose served by it”), cert, denied, 390 U.S. 1025 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Opinion of the Justices
See State v. Cote, 108 N.H. 290, 297 , 235 A.2d 111, 116 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1025 (1968) (use of prior convictions to show nothing more than a disposition to commit the crime charged would violate due process).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mebane
See Chapman v. State of California, [supra].” United States v. Leighton, 386 F.2d 822, 823 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1025 , 88 S. Ct. 1412 , 20 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Steele
It “was not offered under any recognized exception to the general rule of inadmissibility.” State v. Woodbury, 124 N.H. 218, 221 , 469 A.2d 1302, 1304 (1983); see State v. Cote, 108 N.H. 290, 294 , 235 A.2d 111, 114 , cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1025 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Solomon Gaines
See Escobar v. United States, 388 F.2d 661, 664-65 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1024 , 88 S.Ct. 1411 , 20 L.Ed.2d 282 (1968). 16 .
cited
Cited "see"
Bova v. State
See United States v. Leighton, 386 F.2d 822 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1025 , 88 S.Ct. 1412 , 20 L.Ed.2d 282 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bean
See State v. Cote, 108 N.H. 290, 297 , 235 A.2d 111, 116 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1025 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy Mandujano
See United States v. Leighton, 265 F.Supp. 27 (S.D.N.Y.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1025 , 88 S.Ct. 1412 , 20 L.Ed.2d 282 (1968); United States v. Montos, 421 F.2d 215 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1022 , 90 S.Ct. 1262 , 25 L.Ed.2d 532 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Morning Pioneer, Inc. v. The Bismarck Tribune Company, a Corporation, and Cross
See, United States v. Times Mirror Company, 274 F.Supp. 606, 618 (C.D.Cal.1967), aff’d mem., 390 U.S. 712 , 88 S.Ct. 1411 , 20 L.Ed.2d 252 (1968) ; Roberts, Antitrust Problems in the Newspaper Industry, 82 Harv.L.Rev. 319, 320-322 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rangel
See United States v. Leighton, 265 F.Supp. 27 (S.D.N.Y.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1025 , 88 S.Ct. 1412 , 20 L.Ed.2d 282 (1968); United States v. Montos, 421 F.2d 215 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 397 U. S. 1022 , 90 S.Ct. 1262 , 25 L.Ed.2d 532 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Hamilton Farabee
We consider it sufficient. [Cases cited].” See also Grene v. United States, 5 Cir. 1966, 360 F.2d 585, 586 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 978 , 87 S.Ct. 522 , 17 L.Ed.2d 440 ; Woodring v. United States, 10 Cir. 1967, 376 F.2d 619 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 885 , 88 S.Ct. 153 , 19 L.Ed.2d 182 ; accord, Escobar v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 388 F.2d 661 , cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1024 , 88 S.Ct. 1411 , 20 L.Ed.2d 282 ; Hoover v. United States, 5 Cir. 1966, 358 F.2d 87 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 822 , 87 S.Ct. 50 , 17 L.Ed.2d 59 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hickey
See, e.g., State v. Cote, 108 N.H. 290, 294-95 , 235 A.2d 111, 114-15 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1025 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hilltop Realty, Inc.
v.
Seattle First National Bank
v.
Seattle First National Bank
No. 1164.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 1968.
Herbert S. Little for petitioners. Richard S. White for Seattle-First National Bank et al., and James R. Stewart for Austin Co., respondents.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.