Lane v. Texas, 392 U.S. 929 (1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Lane v. Texas, 392 U.S. 929 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
150 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 45 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Ford (haw, 1996-12-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ford
Haw. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
Following federal jurisprudence, we have specifically held that “a defendant charged with a petty crime does not have a constitutional right to a jury trial.” State v. Nakata, 76 Hawai'i 360, 367 , 878 P.2d 699, 706 (quoting State v. Wilson, 75 Haw. 68, 73 , 856 P.2d 1240, 1243 (1993) (citation omitted)), reconsideration denied, 76 Hawai'i 453 , 879 P.2d 558 (1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995); see Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 149-50 , 88 S.Ct. 1444, 1447-48 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 , reh’g denied, 392 U.S. 947 , 88 S.Ct. 2270 , 20 *69 L.Ed.2d 1412 (1…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Sadler
Haw. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 , 88 S.Ct. 1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 reh’g. denied, 392 U.S. 947 , 88 S.Ct. 2270 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1412 (1968); State v. Swain, 61 Haw. 173, 175 , 599 P.2d 282, 284 (1979); State v. Shak, 51 Haw. 612, 614 , 466 P.2d 422, 424 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 930 , 91 S.Ct. 191 , 27 L.Ed.2d 190 (1970).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bianchini (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
D. Vt. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 381 F.2d 529, 539 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 929 , 88 S.Ct. 2273 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1968) (affirming conviction where trial judge delayed determining whether tainted jurors could remain impartial until the taking of evidence had ended).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ianniello
S.D.N.Y. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
United States v. Esposito, 423 F.Supp. 908, 911 (S.D.N.Y.1976); see United States v. Miller, 381 F.2d 529, 536 (2d Cir.1967), cert.denied, 392 U.S. 929 , 88 S.Ct. 66 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1968). 110 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Eric Charles Martin, A/K/A Mickey Milton Arrington (2×)
6th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duncan v. State of Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 149 , 88 S.Ct. 1444, 1447 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 , reh. denied 392 U.S. 947 , 88 S.Ct. 2270 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1412 (1968).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Esposito
unknown court · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 381 F.2d 529, 536 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 929 , 88 S.Ct. 2273 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1968); United States v. White, 386 F.Supp. 882, 885 (E.D.Wis.1974); United States v. Claytor, 52 F.R.D. 360, 361 (S.D.N.Y.1971); United States v. Addonizio, 313 F.Supp. 486, 491 (D.N.J.1970), aff'd, 451 F.2d 49 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 936 , 92 S.Ct. 949 , 30 L.Ed.2d 812 (1972). .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Joel Lozaw (2×)
2d Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 381 F.2d 529, 536 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 929 , 88 S.Ct. 2273 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1387 , rehearing denied, 393 U.S. 902 , 89 S.Ct. 66 , 21 L.Ed. 2d 188 (1968).
discussed Cited "see" Elliott v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lane v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 424 S.W.2d 925 , cert. den. 392 U.S. 929 , 88 S.Ct. 2270 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1387 ; Adair v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 427 S.W.2d 67 (in which this writer dissented).
discussed Cited "see" Corbitt v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lane v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 424 S.W.2d 925 , cert. den. 392 U.S. 929 , 88 S.Ct. 2270 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1387 ; Adair v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 427 S.W.2d 67 (in which this writer dissented).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Ruggiero
S.D.N.Y. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Miller, 381 F.2d 529 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 929 , 88 S.Ct. 2273 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1968). - The appropriate standard of relevance is set out in United States v. Clark, 541 F.2d 1016, 1018 (4th Cir.1976): If the Government intends to introduce evidence of an alias and the use of that alias is necessary to identify the defendant in connection with the acts charged in the indictment, the inclusion of the alias is both relevant and permissible.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Brown v. American Cyanamid & Chemical Corp.
S.D. Ga. · 1973 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Miller, 2 Cir., 381 F.2d 529, 538 (1967), cert. den. 392 U.S. 929 , 88 S.Ct. 2273 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1387 ; United States v. Walker, 3 Cir., 421 F.2d 1298 , *318 1299 (1970); United States v. Jackson, 7 Cir., 429 F.2d 1368, 1373 (1970).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Payne (2×)
Mich. · 1971 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Duncan v. Louisiana (1968), 391 US 145 ( 88 S Ct 1444 , 20 L Ed 2d 491 ), rehearing den 392 US 947 ( 88 S Ct 2270 , 20 L Ed 2d 1412 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lane
v.
Texas
No. 522.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1968.
392 U.S. 929
Emmett Colvin, Jr., for petitioner., Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, R. L. Latti-more, Howard M. Fender, and Robert E. Owen, Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for respondent.
Published

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Motion to dispense with printing petition granted. Cer-tiorari denied.