green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gutierrez
Id. at 806-07; accord State v. Colson, 274 N.C. 295 , 163 S.E.2d 376, 384 (1968) (“Evidence unconstitutionally obtained is excluded in both state and federal courts as an essential to due process, not as a rule of evidence but as a matter of constitutional law.”), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1087 , 89 S.Ct. 876 , 21 L.Ed.2d 780 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Savage v. Commercial Union Insurance
See Johnson v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co., 212 Pa.Super. 89 , 239 A.2d 828 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1087 , 89 S.Ct. 876 , 21 L.Ed.2d 780 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lawn King, Inc.
(2×)
Sullivan, supra, § 139 at 392; Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 65.01[2](6) (vol. 16-H, Bender Business Organization Series); see Bailey’s Bakery, Ltd. v. Continental Baking Co., 235 F.Supp. 705, 721-722 (D.Hawaii 1964), aff’d o. b. 401 F.2d 182 (9 Cir. 1968), cert. den. 393 U.S. 1086 , 89 S.Ct. 874 , 21 L.Ed.2d 779 (1969) (per se rule was inapplicable in civil antitrust suit because no “pernicious effects” were demonstrated and the plaintiff failed to allege that the fixed price in any way prevented the retailer from handling defendant’s bread at a profit; nor…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Stephens
See State v. Branch, 288 N.C. 514 , 220 S.E. 2d 495 (1975), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 53 L.Ed. 2d 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 2971 (1977), and State v. Colson, 274 N.C. 295 , 163 S.E. 2d 376 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1087 , 21 L.Ed. 2d 780 , 89 S.Ct. 876 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burkhead v. Phillips Petroleum Company
See Bailey’s Bakery, Ltd. v. Continental Baking Company, 235 F.Supp. 705, 716-717 (D.Hawaii 1964) aff’d, 401 F.2d 182 (9th Cir. 1968) cert. den. 393 U.S. 1086 , 89 S.Ct. 874 , 21 L.Ed.2d 779 (1968) reh. den. 394 U.S. 967 , 89 S.Ct. 1304 , 22 L.Ed.2d 570 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dade
See, e.g., State v. Colson, 274 N.C. 295, 306 (1968) (“Evidence unconstitutionally obtained is excluded in both state and federal courts as an essential to due process—not as a rule of evidence but as a matter of constitutional law.”), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1087 -7- STATE V.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pachas v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
App. P. 16(a); State v. Mumford, 364 N.C. 394, 398 , 699 S.E.2d 911, 914 (2010); see also State v. Brooks, 337 N.C. 132, 149 , 446 S.E.2d 579, 590 (1994) (explaining that this is the standard of review of a determination by the Court of Appeals whether the case is before us “by appeal of right or discretionary review” (first citing State v. Colson, 274 N.C. 295 , 163 S.E.2d 376 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1087 , 89 S. Ct. 876 , 21 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pachas v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
App. P. 16(a); State v. Mumford, 364 N.C. 394, 398 , 699 S.E.2d 911, 914 (2010); see also State v. Brooks, 337 N.C. 132, 149 , 446 S.E.2d 579, 590 (1994) (explaining that this is the standard of review of a determination by the Court of Appeals whether the case is before us “by appeal of right or discretionary review” (first citing State v. Colson, 274 N.C. 295 , 163 S.E.2d 376 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1087 , 89 S. Ct. 876 , 21 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McKinney
See, e.g., State v. Colson, 274 N.C. 295, 306 , 163 S.E.2d 376, 384 (1968) (“Evidence unconstitutionally obtained is excluded in both state and federal courts as an essential to due process — not as a rule of evidence but as a matter of constitutional law.”), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1087 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp.
See, e. g., this court’s own pronouncement in Bailey’s Bakery, Ltd. v. Continental Baking Co., 235 F.Supp. 705, 717 (D.Haw.1964), aff’d 401 F.2d 182 (9 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1086 , 89 S.Ct. 874 , 21 L.Ed.2d 779 (1969). 148 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morrison
v.
Rarick
v.
Rarick
No. 905.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1969.
Bascom D. Talley, Jr., for petitioner.
Published
Sup. Ct. La. Cer-tiorari denied.