green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corporation
See Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States, Preliminary Draft of Proposed Rules of Evidence for the United States District Courts and Magistrates, Article IX, Rule 9-01 (March 1969) 14 Mr. Justice Harlan, concurring in Green, stated his conclusion that 'the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment reaches no farther than to require the prosecution to produce all available witnesses whose declarations it seeks to use in a criminal trial.' A Confrontation Clause challenge to the co-conspirator exception has been made in Evans v. Dutton, 40…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corporation
See Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States, Preliminary Draft of Proposed Rules of Evidence for the United States District Courts and Magistrates, Article IX, Rule 9-01 (March 1969) 14 Mr. Justice Harlan, concurring in Green, stated his conclusion that "the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment reaches no farther than to require the prosecution to produce all available witnesses whose declarations it seeks to use in a criminal trial." A Confrontation Clause challenge to the co-conspirator exception has been made in Evans v. Dutton, 40…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Rosenzweig
(2×)
See also, Loker v. State, 233 A.2d 342 at 357 , 2 Md.App. 1 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1967), affd. 245 A.2d 814 , 250 Md. 677 , cert. den. 393 U.S. 1082 , 89 S.Ct. 862 , 21 L.Ed.2d 774 (1968); and see, People v. Kagan, 264 Cal.App.2d 648 , 70 Cal.Rptr. 732 (Court of Appeal, 1968), where it was stated that the gist of the crime of embezzlement is "the appropriation to one's own use of *120 property delivered for devotion to a particular purpose other than one's own enjoyment of it." 70 Cal.Rptr. at 740 . [5] It has been held on numerous occasions that an employee who embezzles prop…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward Luce, Robert Kolofer, and James Luigs
See also United States v. Sternback, 402 F.2d 353 (7th Cir.1968), 402 F.2d 353 (7th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1082 , 89 S.Ct. 862 , 21 L.Ed.2d 774 (1969). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Western Seed Production Corp.
v.
Campbell, Judge
v.
Campbell, Judge
No. 832.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1969.
Robert A. Leedy for petitioner., E. Frederick Velikanje for respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Ore. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.