green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Badine
Both this Court and the Court of Appeals have jurisdiction to consider any question of law “involving error or defect in the criminal court proceedings which may have adversely affected the appellant” (CPL 470.15 [1]; see CPL 470.35 [1]), regardless of whether the question is raised on appeal to the Appellate Division (see People v Stubbs, 30 AD2d 932 , cert denied 393 US 1108 ; Matter of Stagnar v Stagnar, 98 AD2d 983 ; see also People v Jones, 95 NY2d 721 ).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Fritschen
See State v. Porter, 201 Kan. 778 , 443 P.2d 360 (1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1108 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Frizzell
See State v. Porter, 201 Kan. 778 , 443 P. 2d 360 , cert. den., 393 U. S. 1108 , 21 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bosby
See also State v. Porter, 201 Kan. 778, 781 , 443 P.2d 360 (1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1108 (1969); State v. Phinis, 199 Kan. 472 , 430 P.2d 251 , [overruled on other grounds State v. Milow, 199 Kan. 576 , 433 P.2d 538 ] (1967). 52A C.J.S., Larceny 6, states: ‘[I]n order to constitute a taking the prospective thief must have obtained at some particular moment the complete, independent, and absolute possession and control of the thing desired adverse to the rights of the owner therein. ‘If the possession of the would-be taker is imperfect in any degree, or if his control of the thing desi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bateson
See also State v. Porter, 201 Kan. 778, 781 , 443 P.2d 360 (1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1108 (1969); State v. Phinis, 199 Kan. 472 , 430 P.2d 251 [, overruled on other grounds State v. Milow, 199 Kan. 576 , 433 P.2d 538 ] (1967). 52A C.J.S., Larceny § 6, states: “ ‘[I]n order to constitute a taking the prospective thief must have obtained at some particular moment the complete, independent, and absolute possession and control of the thing desired adverse to the rights of the owner therein .... “ ‘If the possession of the would-be taker is imperfect in any degree, or if his control of…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Long
See also State v. Porter, 201 Kan. 778, 781 , 443 P.2d 360 (1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1108 (1969); State v. Phinis, 199 Kan. 472 , 430 P.2d 251 (1967). 52A C.J.S., Larceny § 6, states: “[I]n order to constitute a taking the prospective thief must have obtained at some particular moment the complete, independent, and absolute possession and control of the thing desired adverse to the rights of the owner therein ....
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Baines
v.
McGrath, Correction Commissioner
v.
McGrath, Correction Commissioner
No. 1197.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1969.
393 U.S. 1108
William M. Kunstler, Michael Meltsner, and Melvyn Zarr for petitioners.
Published
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.