green
Positive treatment
8.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Teters
See generally Fuller v. United States, 407 F.2d 1199 , 1233 n.52 (D.C.Cir.l968)(en banc), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ron Gillis
See United States v. Haynes, 398 F.2d 980, 983 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 996 , 22 L.Ed.2d 124 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gesch
(2×)
See United States v. Haynes, 398 F.2d 980, 984 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Foster v. State
(2×)
Accord, Gafford v. State, 440 P.2d 405 (Alaska 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 996 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969), overruled on other grounds, 487 P.2d 831 (Alaska 1971); State v. Washington, 383 S.W.2d 518 (Mo.1964); State v. Sinclair, 57 N.J. 56 , 269 A.2d 161 (1970); State v. Sayward, 66 Wash.2d 698 , 404 P.2d 783 (1965); See State v. Sheffield, 251 N.C. 309 , 111 S.E.2d 195 (1959); State v. King, 224 N.C. 329 , 30 S.E.2d 230 (1944); State v. Holder, 153 N.C. 606 , 69 S.E. 66 (1910).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick Roland
See Fuller v. United States, 407 F.2d 1199, 1227 (D.C.Cir.1968) (in banc), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harris
See generally United States v. Haynes, 398 F.2d 980, 983-86 (2nd Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 996 , 22 L.Ed.2d 124 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Meyer v. State
See Gafford v. State, 440 P.2d 405 (Alaska 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 996 , 22 L.Ed. 125 (1969) (harmless error where judge communicated with jury outside defendant’s presence, informing jury that notwithstanding their request, defendant’s presence at reading of verdict was legally required); Kugzruk v. State, 436 P.2d 962 (Alaska 1968) (harmless error where defendant excluded from *640 four anteroom conferences during course of trial because, under previously followed test, no substantial rights were affected). 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ball v. United States
See Fuller v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 264 , 293, 407 F.2d 1199, 1228 (1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. Harris
See United States v. Haynes, 398 F.2d 980, 983-986 (2d Cir. 1968), cert, denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 996 , 22 L.Ed.2d 124 (1969)” Moreover, the court has held that trial judges are to be accorded “broad discretion to determine bias of jurors on challenges for cause.” United States v. Ploof, 464 F.2d 116, 118 (2d Cir. 1972); accord, Mikus v. United States, supra, 433 F.2d at 724 ; United States v. Haynes, 398 F.2d 980, 984 (2d Cir. 1968). 15 There is no evidence in the record of actual bias on the part of juror Wichik.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Finch
Accord, Gafford v. State, 440 F. 2d 405 (Alaska 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 (1969), overruled on other grounds, 487 P. 2d 831 (Alaska 1971); State v. Washington, 383 S.W. 2d 518 (Mo. 1964); State v. Sinclair, *142 57 N.J. 56 , 269 A. 2d 161 (1970); State v. Sayward, 66 Wash. 2d 698 , 404 P. 2d 783 (1965); see State v. Sheffield, 251 N.C. 309 , 111 S.E. 2d 195 (1959); State v. King, 224 N.C. 329 , 30 S.E. 2d 230 (1944); State v. Holder, 153 N.C. 606 , 69 S.E. 66 (1910).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Snethen
See Fuller v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 264 , 407 F.2d 1199, 1212-1213 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (mother questioned defendant in presence of an officer); Duncan v. United States, 197 F.2d 935, 937-938 (5 Cir. 1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 885 , 73 S.Ct. 185 , 97 L.Ed. 685 (wife pleaded to defendant to admit guilt so her mother would not be blamed); Anglin v. State, 259 So.2d 752 (Fla.App.1972) (15 year-old defendant’s mother told him to tell the truth or she would “clobber” him); State v. Alexander, 252 La. 564, 569-570 , 211 So.2d 650, 652…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Washington
See Fuller v. United States, 407 F2d 1199, 1230, n. 40 (DC Cir 1967), cert. denied 393 US 1120 , 89 S Ct 999 , 22 L Ed 2d 125 (1969); People v. Mussenden, 308 NY 558, 562 , 127 NE2d 551 (1955).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Washington
See Fuller v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 264 , 407 F.2d 1199, 1230, n. 40 (1967), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969); People v. Mussenden, 308 N.Y. 558, 562 , 127 N.E.2d 551 (1955).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bowen
See United States v. Haynes, 398 F.2d 980, 983-986 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S. Ct. 996 , 22 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Troy D. Upthegrove
See Fuller v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 264 , 407 F.2d 1199 , on reh. en banc 1227-1228 (1968), cert. den., 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Louis Ammidown, United States of America v. Robert L. Ammidown
See Fuller v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 264 , 293, 407 F.2d 1199 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969); Michael & Wechsler, A Rationale of the Law of Homicide, 37 Colum.L.Rev. 701-02 (1937); Arent & McDonald, The Felony Murder Doctrine and Its Application Under the New York Statutes, 20 Corn.L.Q. 288 (1935). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leonard T. Robinson, United States of America v. James E. McCaffity United States of America v. Louis Johnson
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Fuller v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 264 , 294, 407 F.2d 1199, 1229 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969). 15 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Clark
See United States v. Haynes, 398 F.2d 980, 983-986 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S. Ct. 996 , 22 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Conover v. Commonwealth
See United States v. Haynes, 398 F.2d 980 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 996 , 22 L.Ed.2d 124 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis Rifkin
See United States v. Haynes, 398 F.2d 980, 984 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 996 , 22 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tuggles
See Fuller v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 264 , 407 F.2d 1199 (1967, rehearing en banc 1968), cert, denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969); Fisher v. United States, 324 F.2d 775 (8th Cir. 1963), cert, denied, 377 U.S. 999 , 84 S.Ct. 1935 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1964), rehearing denied, 379 U.S. 873 , 85 S.Ct. 24 , 13 L.Ed.2d 81 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul W. Marcey
See Fuller v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 264 , 294, 297, 407 F.2d 1199, 1229, 1232 (en banc 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969); Belton v. United States, 127 U.S.App.D.C. 201 , 206-207, 382 F.2d 150, 155-156 (1967); Chillo v. United States, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 31 , 325 F.2d 227 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
Denny Lee Gafford v. Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, and State of Alaska
See Gafford v. State, Alaska, 440 P.2d 405 , cert. denied 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 996 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 .
cited
Cited "see"
John Mikus v. United States
See United States v. Haynes, 398 F.2d 980, 983-986 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 996 , 22 L.Ed.2d 124 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Kay F. Glenn v. United States
See Fuller v. United States, 132 U.S. App.D.C. 264, 292-93, 407 F.2d 1199, 1227-1228 (en banc 1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hicks
See, e.g., Gafford v. State, 440 P. 2d 405, 413 (Alaska 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 996 , 22 L.Ed. 2d 125 (1969); State v. Arney, 731 S.W. 2d 36, 38 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987); State v. Finch, 293 N.C. 132 , 235 S.E. 2d 819, 825 (1977); State v. Johnson, 231 N.W. 2d 180, 184-85 (N.D. 1975); Lee v. State, 560 P. 2d 226, 232 (Okla.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Robinson
See, e.g., Gafford v. State, 440 P.2d 405, 413 (Alaska 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S. Ct. 996 , 22 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Warren v. State
(2×)
See also Fuller v. United States, 407 F.2d 1199 (D.C.Cir.1967), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Narcia
See, e.g., Fuller v. United States, 407 F.2d 1199 (D.C.Cir.1968), cert, denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969) (indictment charged defendant with first degree felony murder, first degree premeditated murder, and rape based on a single incident with one woman); Sims v. United States, 405 F.2d 1381 (D.C.Cir.1968) (defendants charged with felony murder and first degree premeditated murder for allegedly fatally shooting one cab driver).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Davidson
Scott v. United States, 354 F.2d 292, 296 , 173 Ct.Cl. 650 (1965); see also Gefen v. United States, 400 F.2d 476, 482 (5th Cir.1968), certiorari denied, 393 U.S. 1119 , 89 S.Ct. 990 , 22 L.Ed.2d 123 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dale Francis Catches v. United States
See also Fuller v. United States, 132 U.S. App.D.C. 264, 292, 407 F.2d 1199, 1227 (1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969); United States v. Butler, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 270 , 455 F.2d 1338 (1972); O’Clair v. United States, 470 F.2d 1199 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 921 , 93 S.Ct. 2741 , 37 L.Ed.2d 148 (1973); Gant v. United States, 506 F.2d 518 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1005 , 95 S.Ct. 1449 , 43 L.Ed.2d 764 (1975). 13 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Henry Brown
See also, Fuller v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 264 , 407 F.2d 1199 , 1230 n. 41 (1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969); 8A J.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
North American Life and Casualty Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See, e. g., Franklin Life Insurance Co. v. United States, 399 F.2d 757 (7th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1118 , 89 S.Ct. 989 , 22 L.Ed.2d 123 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald Jackson Crane
(2×)
See also, United States v. Haynes, 398 F.2d 980 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 996 , 22 L.Ed.2d 124 (1969), Casias v. United States, 315 F.2d 614 (10th Cir. 1963) (en banc), and United States v. Stevens, 444 F.2d 630, 632 (6th Cir. 1971), where this court held that 'whenever avoidable, jurors should not be called to serve in cases involving witnesses or parties who participated in cases in which they were previously impanelled.' In addition, the tandem procedure confused the role of appellant's counsel whose client's case did not enjoy the first priority on the jury's a…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Franchise Finance & Management Co.
See also Gefen v. United States, 400 F.2d 476 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1119 , 89 S.Ct. 990 , 22 L.Ed.2d 123 (1969), citing Damsky v. Zavatt, 289 F.2d 46 (2nd Cir. 1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alan Keith Stevens
See also United States v. Haynes, 398 F.2d 980 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 996 , 22 L.Ed.2d 124 (1969), where the fact that seven jurors who sat in a defendant’s narcotics trial had been jurors in previous narcotics cases where some of the same Government witnesses had testified did not establish that the jurors were prejudiced as a matter of law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Planitiff-Appellee v. Harold Frank White, No. 29259 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
See also Fuller v. United States, 1968, D.C.Cir. 1968, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 264 , 407 F.2d 1199, 1223 (en banc), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 ; Milanovich v. United States, 4 Cir. 1960, 275 F.2d 716, 722-723 (Sobeloff, J., dissenting).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harold Frank White
See also Fuller v. United States, 1968, D.C.Cir. 1968, 132 U.S. App.D.C. 264, 407 F.2d 1199, 1223 (en banc), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 ; Milanovich v. United States, 4 Cir. 1960, 275 F.2d 716, 722-723 (Sobeloff, J., dissenting).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McKoy v. United States
See also United States v. Fuller, 243 F.Supp. 203 (D.D.C.1965), aff’d, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 264 , 407 F.2d 1199 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1120 , 89 S.Ct. 999 , 22 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-Party
Liability attaches to those with power and responsibility within the corporate structure for seeing that the taxes withheld from various sources are remitted to the Government Scott v. United States, 354 F.2d 292, 296 , 173 Ct.Cl. 650 (1965); see also Gefen v. United States, 400 F.2d 476, 482 (5th Cir.1968), certiorari denied, 393 U.S. 1119 , 89 S.Ct. 990 , 22 L.Ed.2d 123 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stanek
v.
Civil Service Commission of City of Pittsburgh
v.
Civil Service Commission of City of Pittsburgh
No. 968.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1969.
393 U.S. 1120
Robert E. Kline for petitioner., Robert E. Dauer for respondents.
Published
Allegheny County Ct. (now Common Pleas Ct.). Certiorari denied.