green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
See, State v. McCormick, 426 S.W.2d 62, 63 (Mo.1968) cert. denied, 394 U.S. 930 , 89 S.Ct. 1199 , 22 L.Ed.2d 460 , habeas corpus relief denied, McCormick v. Swenson, 328 F.Supp. 646, 648 (E.D.Mo.1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Silides v. Thomas
See Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith v. FCC, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 146 , 403 F.2d 169 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 930 , 89 S.Ct. 1190 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Sun Oil Co. v. FPC, 256 F.2d 233 (5th Cir. 1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zucker v. Sable
See, Mader v. Armel, 402 F.2d 158 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 930 , 89 S. Ct.. 1188, 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969). 4 In determining whether plaintiff has reasonably relied upon alleged misrepresentations and/or non-disclosures, the plaintiff’s business sophistication, expertise and acumen have been considered by the federal courts.
cited
Cited "see"
The Citizens Committee to Keep Progressive Rock v. Federal Communications Commission, Midwestern Broadcasting Company, Intervenor
See Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith v. FCC, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 146 , 403 F.2d 169, 171 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 930 , 89 S.Ct. 1190 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,718 Glen J. Travis v. Anthes Imperial Limited
See generally, Mader v. Armel, 402 F.2d 158 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, sub nom Young v. Mader, 394 U.S. 930 , 89 S.Ct. 1188 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Britt v. Cyril Bath Company
See Mader v. Armel, 402 F.2d 158, 162-63 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 930 , 89 S.Ct. 1188 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Company, 401 F.2d 833 , 848-850 (2d Cir. 1968); List v. Fashion Park, Incorporated, 340 F.2d 457 , 462 (2d Cir. 1965); Kohler v. Kohler Company, 319 F.2d 634, 642 , 7 A.L.R.3d 486 (7th Cir. 1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Britt v. Cyril Bath Co.
See Mader v. Armel, 402 F.2d 158, 162-63 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 930 , 89 S.Ct. 1188 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Company, 401 F.2d 833 , 848-850 (2d Cir. 1968); List v. Fashion Park, Incorporated, 340 F.2d 457 , 462 (2d Cir. 1965); Kohler v. Kohler Company, 319 F.2d 634, 642 , 7 A.L.R.3d 486 (7th Cir. 1963).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
O'Neil v. Appel
See, e.g., Mader v. Armel, 402 F.2d 158, 161 (6th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 930 , 89 S.Ct. 1188 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jordan v. Global Natural Resources, Inc.
See e.g., Mader v. Armel, 402 F.2d 158 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 930 , 89 S.Ct. 1188 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Miner v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission
It is undisputed that the CFEC did not afford Miner a hearing at all. 13 Although this is normally one of the basic components of due process, it is subject, at least in the area of administrative law, to the exception that one need not hold a hearing if there is nothing to hold a hearing about; or, more precisely, “there is no requirement, constitutional or otherwise, that there be a hearing in the absence of substantial and material issues crucial to [the] determination.” NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821, 826 (4th Cir. 1967); see also Anti-Defamation League v. FCC, 403 F.2d 169 , 171 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Young
v.
Mader
v.
Mader
No. 970.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 24, 1969.
Robert H. Hoffman and Katheleen K. Haase for petitioner., Lyman Broom-field for respondents.
Granted, Should, White.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice White is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.