green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1985 ·
…the absolute right of removal can be exercised only once
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Marshall v. State
it is clear that in maryland comment upon a defendant's failure to testify in a state criminal trial was forbidden long prior to griffin v. california
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Johnson v. State
(2×)
the absolute right of removal can be exercised only once
discussed
Cited "see"
Dorsey v. State
"A jury is presumed to understand and follow the court’s instructions.” Whittington v. State, 147 Md.App. 496, 534 , 809 A.2d 721 (2002), cert. denied, 373 Md. 408 , 818 A.2d 1107 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 851 , 124 S.Ct. 136 , 157 L.Ed.2d 92 (2003); see Veney v. State, 251 Md. 182, 198 , 246 A.2d 568 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 948 , 89 S.Ct. 1284 , 22 L.Ed.2d 482 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Whittington v. State
See Veney v. State, 251 Md. 182, 198 , 246 A.2d 568 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 948 , 89 S.Ct. 1284 , 22 L.Ed.2d 482 (1969); Wilson v. State, 136 Md.App. 27, 72 , 764 A.2d 284 (2000), rev’d. on other grounds, 370 Md. 191 , 803 A.2d 1034 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dingle v. State
(2×)
See Veney v. State, 251 Md. 182, 190-97 , 246 A.2d 568, 573-76 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 948 , 89 S.Ct. 1284 , 22 L.Ed.2d 482 (1969); Seidman v. State, 230.
cited
Cited "see"
Roberts v. State
See Veney v. State, 251 Md. 159, 166 , 246 A.2d 608, 613 (1968), cert, denied, 394 U.S. 948 , 89 S.Ct. 1284 , 22 L.Ed.2d 482 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Calhoun v. State
(2×)
Accord, Tichnell v. State, 287 Md. 695, 717 , 415 A.2d 830 (1980)." 293 Md. at 175-76 (footnote omitted). [4] *639 On the burden of proof see also Veney v. State, 251 Md. 182, 201 , 246 A.2d 568 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 948 (1969), a capital case, where we referred to Pressley v. State, 244 Md. 664, 667 , 224 A.2d 866 (1966), as to the sufficiency of evidence, and Ramsey v. State, 239 Md. 561, 566-67 , 212 A.2d 319 (1965), as to our function as an appellate court as to sufficiency of the evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Campbell v. State
Brady v. State, 222 Md. 442 , 160 A.2d 912 (1960); Shockley v. State, 218 Md. 491, 497 , 148 A.2d 371, 374 (1959); see Veney v. State, 251 Md. 159, 174 , 246 A.2d 608, 617 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 948 , 89 S.Ct. 1284 (1969); see also Mumford v. State, 19 Md.
cited
Cited "see"
Funkhouser v. State
See Veney v. State, 251 Md. 159, 172-173 , 246 A.2d 608 , cert. denied, 394 U.S. 948 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Newton v. State
(2×)
See Veney v. State, 251 Md. 159, 174 , 246 A.2d 608 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 948 , 89 S.Ct. 1284 , 22 L.Ed.2d 482 (1969); Stansbury v. State, supra, 218 Md. at 260 ; Mumford v. State, 19 Md.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pantazes v. State
See also, Veney v. State, 251 Md. 182, 191 , 246 A.2d 568, 573 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 948 , 89 S.Ct. 1284 , 22 L.Ed.2d 482 (1969) (‘the absolute right of removal can be exercised only once’); Lee v. State, 164 Md. 550, 552 , 165 A. 614, 615 , cert. denied, 290 U.S. 639 , 54 S.Ct. 56 , 78 L.Ed. 555 (1933) (and cases cited therein) (‘the right [of removal] had been and can only be exercised once’).” Id., 495 A.2d at 10 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maloney
v.
West Virginia
v.
West Virginia
No. 1365.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 1, 1969.
394 U.S. 948
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (3)
Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied.