green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jakubowski
See Schatz, 943 F.2d at 491 (noting difference between professionals who make “affirmative misrepresentations” and professionals who simply “fail to tattle on their elient[s]”). *1082 Sixth, Jakubowski argues that he is not liable because he was “little more than a finder,” citing SEC v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453 , 460-61 (2d Cir.1968), ce rt. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.
See Securities and Exchange Commission v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453, 457 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Feit v. Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corporation
See SEC v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453, 459-460 (2d Cir. *570 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969); III L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. North American Research & Development Corp.
See SEC v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453, 456-458 (2d Cir. 1968) (in banc), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969); SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 401 F.2d 833 , 866 (Friendly, J., concurring), 869-870 (Hays, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (2d Cir. 1968) (in banc), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
Securities and Exchange Commission v. North American Research and Development Corp., Edward White and K. Ralph Bowman, Securities and Exchange Commission v. North American Research and Development Corp., and Martin Orenzoff, Alfred Blumberg, Lewis Dillman and Lars Hagglof & Co., Ltd.
See SEC v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453, 456-458 (2d Cir. 1968) (in banc), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Great American Industries, Inc.
See 89 S.Ct. 1770 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, Inc. Appeal of S. Mort Zimmerman
See also SEC v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453, 456-58 (2d Cir. 1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. M. A. Lundy Associates
See also, S.E.C. v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969); S.E.C. v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 401 F.2d 833 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied 404 U.S. 1005 , 92 S.Ct. 561 , 30 L.Ed.2d 558 (1971); List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Semmes Motors, Inc., Suing on Behalf of Itself and Together With Ford Dealers Alliance, Inc., Etc. v. Ford Motor Company
Our recital has already demonstrated that scant heed was paid to our observations in SEC v. Frank, 388 F.2d 486, 490-492 (2 Cir. 1968); see also SEC v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453 , 455 (2 Cir. 1968, in banc), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969), concerning the undesirability of issuing temporary injunctions solely on the basis of affidavits, particularly in “cases where everything turns on what happened and that is in sharp dispute.” We recognize that this case differed from Frank in the greater urgency of Semmes’ need, and we would have …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Yeager, Principal Keeper
v.
O'Connor
v.
O'Connor
No. 1189.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 26, 1969.
Abel Goldstein for petitioners.
Cited by 18 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed herein in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.