Hiland Dairy, Inc. v. Kroger Co., 395 U.S. 961 (1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Hiland Dairy, Inc. v. Kroger Co., 395 U.S. 961 (1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“in testing the legal sufficiency of the complaint . . . conclusions of law and unreasonable inferences or unwarranted deductions of fact are not admitted.”
87 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 30 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mid-America Regional Bargaining Association v. Will County Carpenters District Council (ca7, 1982-04-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Mid-America Regional Bargaining Association v. Will County Carpenters District Council
7th Cir. · 1982 · signal: accord · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
in testing the legal sufficiency of the complaint . . . conclusions of law and unreasonable inferences or unwarranted deductions of fact are not admitted.
discussed Cited "see" Bloom v. Hennepin County
D. Minnesota · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hiland Dairy, Inc. v. Kroger Co., 402 F.2d 968, 974 (8th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 961 , 89 S.Ct. 2096 , 23 L.Ed.2d 748 (1969) (twenty percent insufficient for actual monopolization); United States v. Empire Gas Co., 537 F.2d 296, 305 (8th Cir.1976), ce r., denied, 429 U.S. 1122 , 97 S.Ct. 1158 , 51 L.Ed.2d 572 (1977) (forty-seven to fifty percent insufficient to show dangerous probability of success).
cited Cited "see" Lektro-Vend Corporation v. The Vendo Company
7th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hiland Dairy, Inc. v. Kroger Co., 402 F.2d 968, 974 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 961 , 89 S.Ct. 2096 , 23 L.Ed.2d 748 (1969).
cited Cited "see" Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co.
7th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hiland Dairy, Inc. v. Kroger Co., 402 F.2d 968, 974 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 961 , 89 S.Ct. 2096 , 23 L.Ed.2d 748 (1969).
cited Cited "see" Joseph A. Orlando and Anna L. Orlando v. Tony Alamo, Susan Alamo and the Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation
8th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hiland Dairy, Inc. v. Kroger Co., 402 F.2d 968, 973 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 961 , 89 S.Ct. 2096 , 23 L.Ed.2d 748 (1969).
cited Cited "see" Buffalo Courier-Express, Inc. v. Buffalo Evening News, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hiland Dairy, Inc. v. Kroger Co., 402 F.2d 968, 972 (8 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 961 , 89 S.Ct. 2096 , 23 L.Ed.2d 748 (1969).
cited Cited "see" Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. v. Dain, Kalman & Quail, Inc.
N.D. Iowa · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hiland Dairy, Inc. v. Kroger Co., 402 F.2d 968, 974-75 (8th Cir. 1968) cert. denied 395 U.S. 961 , 89 S.Ct. 2096 , 23 L.Ed.2d 748 (1969).
discussed Cited "see" Viola McKinney v. Lee E. De Bord (2×)
9th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(c)(1) 2 See, e.g., DeWitt v. Pail, 366 F.2d 682, 685 (9th Cir. 1966) 3 See Hiland Dairy, Inc. v. Kroger Co., 402 F.2d 968, 973 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 961 , 89 S.Ct. 2096 , 23 L.Ed.2d 748 (1969); Ryan v. Scoggin, 245 F.2d 54, 57 (10th Cir. 1957); Ogden River Water Users' Ass'n v. Weber Basin Water Conservancy, 238 F.2d 936, 940 (10th Cir. 1956); International Bank of Miami v. Banco de Economias y Prestamos, 55 F.R.D. 180, 186 (D.Puerto Rico 1972); Herman v. C.
discussed Cited "see" HF & S. COMPANY v. American Standard, Inc.
D. Kan. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hiland Dairy, Inc. v. Kroger Company (8th Cir. 1968) 402 F.2d 968, 971 , cert. den. 395 U.S. 961 , 89 S.Ct. 2096 , 23 L.Ed.2d 748 ; Cliff Food Stores, Inc. v. Kroger, Inc. (5th Cir. 1969) 417 F.2d 203, 207 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." L.J. Zucca, Inc. v. Allen Bros. Wholesale Distributors inc.
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hiland Dairy, Inc. v. Kroger Co., 402 F.2d 968, 973-75 (8th Cir. 1968) (sales of dairy products as loss-leaders gave no rise to dangerous probability of monopoly in a highly-competitive dairy market), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 961 , 89 S. Ct. 2096 , 23 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Falstaff Brewing Co. v. Stroh Brewery Co.
N.D. Cal. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hiland Dairy, Inc. v. Kroger Co., 402 F.2d 968 (8th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 961 , 89 S.Ct. 2096 , 23 L.Ed.2d 748 (1969) (twenty percent market share inadequate to allow exclusion of competition or control of prices).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Corp.
N.D. Ill. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hiland Dairy, Inc. v. Kroger Co., 402 F.2d 968, 973-75 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 961 , 89 S.Ct. 2096 , 23 L.Ed.2d 748 (1969) (holding that “loss leader” sales in that case did not give rise to dangerous probability of monopoly).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hiland Dairy, Inc.
v.
Kroger Co.
No. 986.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1969.
395 U.S. 961
Gray L. Dorsey, Lynn C. Paulson, and Edward F. O’Herin for petitioners., Norman Diamond for respondent., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Mc-Laren, Lawrence G. Wallace, and Howard E. Shapiro filed a memorandum for the United States as amicus curiae, by invitation of the Court, 394 U. S. 903.
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.