green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.4 score
“statements made by a party on the witness stand, if adverse to his interest, are considered to be admissions, and as such, they are admissible evidence against the maker in a subsequent criminal prosecution against him;”
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sims v. Wyrick
statements made by a party on the witness stand, if adverse to his interest, are considered to be admissions, and as such, they are admissible evidence against the maker in a subsequent criminal prosecution against him;
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Grand Jury Subpoena
Accord Heligman v. United States, 407 F.2d 448, 451-52 (8th Cir.) (the purpose of tax laws is to raise public funds, not to punish crimes) cert, denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2129 , 23 L.Ed.2d 765 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Herbert W. Neal
See Hale v. United States, 406 F.2d 476, 479 (10 Cir.1969), cert. den. 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2129 , 23 L.Ed.2d 765 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roy D. Garner v. United States
See Heligman v. United States, 407 F.2d 448 , 450-451 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2129 , 23 L.Ed.2d 765 (1969) ; Grimes v. United States, 379 F.2d 791 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 846 , 88 S.Ct. 104 , 19 L.Ed.2d 113 (1967) ; Stillman v. United States, 177 F.2d 607, 618 (9th Cir. 1949) (which the majority overrules) ; Shushan v. United States, 117 F.2d 110 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 313 U.S. 574 , 61 S.Ct. 1085 , 85 L.Ed. 1531 (1941). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Mason
We also recognize that the United States Supreme Court, through Mr. Justice Brandeis, has indicated that, under a Federal statute, the crime of perjury is complete when the oath is taken with the necessary intent, even though the false affidavit is never used. ( United States v. Noveck (1927), 273 U.S. 202 , 71 L.Ed. 610 , 47 S.Ct. 341 ; see also Hale v. United States (10th Cir.1969), 406 F.2d 476 , cert. denied (1969), 395 U.S. 977 , 23 L.Ed.2d 765 , 89 S.Ct. 2129 .) However, since the Illinois courts have required not only a filing, but, as we believe, use of the sworn statement before a tri…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Thomas
See also State v. Poison, 92 Idaho 615 , 448 P.2d 229 (1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2129 , 23 L.Ed.2d 765 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Heligman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 1307.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 1969.
Irl B. Baris for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, Joseph M. Howard, and John P. Burke for the United States.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. Missouri (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.