green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sidney Levine and Mpd Film Productions, Inc.
See Spillman v. United States, 413 F.2d 527, 530 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 930 , 90 S.Ct. 265 , 24 L.Ed.2d 228 (1969); United States v. Peller, 170 F.2d 1006 (2d Cir. 1948).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alex Harding, A/K/A Mark Harding
See Spillman v. United States, 413 F.2d 527 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 930 , 90 S.Ct. 265 , 24 L.Ed.2d 228 (1969) (“The appellant cannot stipulate to obscenity in order to avoid having the jury view the films and then claim they are not really obscene within the definition or meaning of the statute.”); United States v. Rodriguez, 241 F.2d 463 (7th Cir. 1957) (A stipulation pertained to identity of the substance as marijuana and eliminated the necessity of evidence.); cf. Tomlinson v. Lefkowitz, 334 F.2d 262 (5 Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 650 , 13 L.Ed.2d 556 (19…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ahmad
See, Spillman v. United States, 413 F.2d 527 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 930 , 90 S.Ct. 265 , 24 L.Ed.2d 228 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bass Anglers Sportsman's Society of America v. Scholze Tannery, Inc.
See Spillman v. United States, 413 F.2d 527 (9th Cir. 1969) cert. den. 396 U.S. 930 , 90 S.Ct. 265 , 24 L.Ed.2d 228 ; Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243 (5th Cir. 1967) cert. den. 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 ; United States v. Cox, 342 F.2d 167 (5th Cir. 1965) cert. den. 381 U.S. 935 , 85 S.Ct. 1767 , 14 L.Ed.2d 700 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Petrov
(2×)
See, e.g., Spillman v. United States, 413 F.2d 527 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 930 , 90 S.Ct. 265 , 24 L.Ed.2d 228 (1969); United States v. Peller, 170 F.2d 1006 (2d Cir.1948). 3 It is quite another to impose it upon a photo processor who simply returns to a photographer film that is mailed for developing and printing.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hooks v. State
See, e. g., U. S. v. Fidanzi, 7th Cir., 411 F.2d 1361 (1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 929 , 90 S.Ct. 265 , 24 L.Ed.2d 227 (1969); Commonwealth v. Cherry, Pa. Supr., 474 Pa. 295 , 378 A.2d 800 (1977); Commonwealth v. Gilman, Pa.Supr., 270 Pa. 179 , 368 A.2d 253 (1977); Commonwealth v. Harvell, Pa.Supr., 458 Pa. 406 , 327 A.2d 27 (1974); Commonwealth v. Lipscomb, Pa. Supr., 455 Pa. 525 , 317 A.2d 205 (1974); ABA Standards § 5.8(c).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Terrence Dean Oaks
Compare Spillman v. United States, 413 F.2d 527, 530 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 930 , 90 S.Ct. 265 , 24 L.Ed.2d 228 (1969), where we held that mere deviation from prosecutorial “policy” could not justify acquittal.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fidanzi
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 521.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 17, 1969.
Julius Lucius Echeles for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.