discussed Cited "see" Rives v. Franklin Life Insurance See Sitton v. United States, 413 F.2d 1386, 1389 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 988 , 90 S.Ct. 1118 , 25 L.Ed.2d 395 (1970) (federal courts have no authority to act as an appellate arm of the state courts); Resolute Insurance Co. v. North Carolina, 397 F.2d 586, 589 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 978 , 89 S.Ct. 446 , 21 L.Ed.2d 439 (1968) (federal district courts do not act in essentially appellate capacity to review a state court decision alleged to be erroneous).

discussed Cited "see" Rives v. Franklin Life Insurance Company See Sitton v. United States, 413 F.2d 1386, 1389 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 988 , 90 S.Ct. 1118 , 25 L.Ed.2d 395 (1970) (federal courts have no authority to act as an appellate arm of the state courts); Resolute Insurance Co. v. North Carolina, 397 F.2d 586, 589 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 978 , 89 S.Ct. 446 , 21 L.Ed.2d 439 (1968) (federal district courts do not act in essentially appellate capacity to review a state court decision alleged to be erroneous).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." MacKay v. Pfeil See also Sitton v. United States, 413 F.2d 1386, 1389 (5th Cir.1969) (holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1345 , which gives district courts original jurisdiction of civil actions where the United States is a plaintiff, "can in no way be interpreted as a grant to the district courts of the power to act in an appellate capacity to review the propriety of a state court decision”), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 988 , 90 S.Ct. 1118 , 25 L.Ed.2d 395 (1970). .