green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
See Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971); Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes, 449 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.1971), rev’d on other grounds, 409 U.S. 363 , 93 S.Ct. 647 , 34 L.Ed.2d 577 (1973). 7 Congress has not yet provided that prejudgment interest can be awarded as a mat ter of course to private litigants in antitrust suits.
cited
Cited "see"
Keystone Shipping Co. v. United States
See Marine Carriers Corp. v. Fowler, 429 F.2d 702, 706-07 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 631 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co.
See *1166 Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873 (7th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971).
examined
Cited "see"
MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873, 879 (7th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 584, 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Independence Tube Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant v. Copperweld Corporation and Regal Tube Company, Defendants-Counterplaintiffs v. David F. Grohne, Counterdefendant
See Trabert & Hoeffer, Inc. v. Piaget Watch Corp., 633 F.2d 477, 484 (7th Cir. 1980) and Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873, 880 (7th Cir. 1970), certiorari denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 , both cases in which we followed the Supreme Court's lead. 37 As already mentioned, Judge Will was more cautious in instructing the jury, however (Indep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Independence Tube Corp. v. Copperweld Corp.
See Trabert & Hoeffer, Inc. v. Piaget Watch Corp., 633 F.2d 477, 484 (7th Cir. 1980) and Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873, 880 (7th Cir. 1970), certiorari denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 , both cases in which we followed the Supreme Court’s lead. 37 As already mentioned, Judge Will was more cautious in instructing the jury, however (Indep.
cited
Cited "see"
Lafayette Beverage Distributors, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
Accord, Locklin v. DayGlo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873, 879 (7th Cir. 1970), cert, den., 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elliott v. Roach
See generally 20001 Inc. v. Novaglas Corp., (E.D.N.Y.1973) 60 F.R.D. 649 , where it is stated “pendent jurisdiction should be freely exercised to deal with non-federal, permissive counterclaims, where convenient and in the interest of judicial economy.” Id. at 650 (citing United States v. Heyward-Robinson Co., (2d Cir. 1970 Friendly, J., concurring) 430 F.2d 1077 , 1089, cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Bathke
See Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corporation, 429 F.2d 873 , 879 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 584 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971); Aumiller v. University of Delaware, supra at 682; Richardson v. Civil Serv.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Bathke
See Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corporation, 429 F.2d 873 , 879 (7th Cir. 1970), Cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 584 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971); Aumiller v. University of Delaware, supra at 682 ; Richardson v. Civil Serv.
discussed
Cited "see"
Shreeves v. United States
See United States v. Tourine, 428 F.2d 865, 868-69 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 *787 L.Ed.2d 631 (1971); Schuermann v. United States, 174 F.2d 397, 401 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 831 , 70 S.Ct. 69 , 94 L.Ed. 505 (1949).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. Pederson
See United States v. Tourine, 428 F.2d 865, 869 (2 Cir.), cert, denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 631 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
L & Lc Trucking Co. v. Jack Freeman Trucking Co.
See Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 ; Tonchen v. All-Steel Equipment, Inc., 13 Ill.App.3d 454 , 300 N.E.2d 616 .
cited
Cited "see"
(1974)
See Stanley v. Illinois (1971), 400 U.S. 1020 , 27 L.Ed.2d 631 , 91 S.Ct. 584 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Data Digests, Inc. v. Standard & Poor's Corp.
See Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp., 392 U.S. 134, 147 , 88 S.Ct. 1981 , 20 L.Ed.2d 982 (1968) (Fortas, J., concurring). . 15 U.S.C. § 15 ; see generally Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971); Bergen Drug Co. v. Parke, Davis & Co., 307 F.2d 725, 727-728 (3d Cir. 1962); Kinnear-Weed Corp. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 214 F.2d 891, 893-894 (5th Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 912 , 75 S.Ct. 292 , 99 L.Ed. 715 (1955); S. Oppenheim & G.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manhattan Tankers, Inc. v. Elizabeth H. Dole, Secretary of Transportation Manhattan Tankers, Inc. v. Elizabeth H. Dole, Secretary of Transportation Ogden Challenger Transport, Inc.
See Preamble Discussion of Regulations Implementing the Wrecked Vessels Statute, 47 Fed.Reg. 27492 (1982); see also 36 Op. Att'y Gen. 302 , 310-11 (1930) (construing Jones Act and Wrecked Vessels Statute to reflect a consistent policy) and Marine Carriers Corp. v. Fowler, 429 F.2d 702, 708 (2d Cir.1970) (the Jones Act seeks "to protect American shipping industry already engaged in the coastwise trade"), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 631 (1971) 4 Manhattan Tankers also argues that participation by other shipowners was "required to protect against the potential for abus…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manhattan Tankers, Inc. v. Dole
See Preamble Discussion of Regulations Implementing the Wrecked Vessels Statute, 47 Fed.Reg. 27492 (1982); see also 36 Op. Att’y Gen. 302, 310-11 (1930) (construing Jones Act and Wrecked Vessels Statute to reflect a consistent policy) and Marine Carriers Corp. v. Fowler, 429 F.2d 702, 708 (2d Cir.1970) (the Jones Act seeks "to protect American shipping industry already engaged in the coastwise trade"), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 631 (1971). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Premier Electrical Construction Co. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
See, e.g., Locklin v. Day Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873 (7th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971); Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 388 F.2d 25 (7th Cir.1967) aff'd in part and rev’d in part, 395 U.S. 100 , 89 S.Ct. 1562 , 23 L.Ed.2d 129 (1969); Dairy Foods, Inc. v. Dairy Maid Products Co-operative, 297 F.2d 805 (7th Cir.1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jay Edwards, Inc. v. New England Toyota Distributor, Inc.
Mere generosity of an award, however, does not justify an appellate court in setting it aside, and we cannot say that the award here, for the period of NET’s distributorship, exceeds “any rational appraisal or estimate of the damages that could be based upon evidence before the jury.” Glazer v. Glazer, 374 F.2d 390, 413 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 831 , 88 S.Ct. 100 , 19 L.Ed.2d 90 (1967); see also Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873, 880 (7th Cir.1970) (“we must affirm unless the findings are beyond the pale of sane judgment”), ce rt. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City Of Mishawaka, Indiana v. American Electric Power Company, Inc.
See also Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873 , 878 & n. 13 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971); Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Zenith Radio Corp., Inc., 388 F.2d 25, 35 (7th Cir. 1967), aff'd in part and rev'd in part, 395 U.S. 100 , 89 S.Ct. 1562 , 23 L.Ed.2d 129 (1969). 54 Similarly, in this case, the trial court found that the municipalities had no choice but to file an administrative action before the commission to prevent the loss of their wholesale power source and to establish their right to equal treatment with the utility's retail …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Mishawaka v. American Electric Power Co.
See also Locklin v. DayGlo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873 , 878 & n. 13 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971); Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Zenith Radio Corp., Inc., 388 F.2d 25, 35 (7th Cir. 1967), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 395 U.S. 100 , 89 S.Ct. 1562 , 23 L.Ed.2d 129 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Louis Vines
United States v. Mendoza, 5 Cir. 1973, 473 F.2d 697, 700 ; see also, United States v. Tourine, 2 Cir. 1970, 428 F.2d 865, 868-9 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 631 , rehearing denied, 401 U.S. 966 , 91 S.Ct. 968 , 28 L.Ed.2d 249 ; United States v. Salas, 2 Cir. 1967, 387 F.2d 121, 122 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Apodaca
v.
Oregon
v.
Oregon
No. 5338.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1971.
Published
Ct. App. Ore. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 901.] Motion to dispense with printing amicus curiae brief of National Legal Aid & Defender Assn, granted.