green
Positive treatment
0.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.
See, also, e.g., Mississippi v. Arkansas, 402 U.S. 926 , 91 S.Ct. 1521 , 28 L.Ed.2d 861 (1971) (appointing master in boundary dispute); 411 U.S. 913 , 93 S.Ct. 1539 , 36 L.Ed.2d 305 (1973) (accepting master’s report); 415 U.S. 289 , 94 S.Ct. 1046 , 39 L.Ed.2d 333 (1974) (decision).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hart v. Community Sch. Bd. of Brooklyn, NY Sch. D. 21
See also, e. g., Mississippi v. Arkansas, 402 U.S. 926 , 91 S.Ct. 1521 , 28 L.Ed.2d 861 (1971) (appointing master in boundary dispute); 411 U.S. 913 , 93 S.Ct. 1539 , 36 L.Ed.2d 305 (1973) (accepting master’s report); 415 U.S. 289 , 94 S.Ct. 1046 , 39 L.Ed.2d 333 (1974) (decision).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Negre
v.
Larsen Koserkoff v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. Davenport v. City Rent and Rehabilitation Administration of the City of New York Cataldo v. United States Stead v. United States Tilli v. County of Northampton
v.
Larsen Koserkoff v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. Davenport v. City Rent and Rehabilitation Administration of the City of New York Cataldo v. United States Stead v. United States Tilli v. County of Northampton
No. 325; No. 991; No. 1149; No. 1221; No. 6419; No. 6441.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 26, 1971.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
Opinion text not yet available. Try Google Scholar