Doepke v. Doepke (N.D. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Doepke v. Doepke (N.D. 2009). Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Entzie v. Entzie (nd, 2010-10-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Entzie v. Entzie
N.D. · 2010 · confidence medium
Code § 75-02-04.1-05(3); Doepke, 2009 ND 10, ¶¶ 7, 12 , 760 N.W.2d 131 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Peltier
N.D. · 2010 · confidence medium
Code § 75-02-04.1-05(3); Doepke , 2009 ND 10, ¶¶ 7, 12 , 760 N.W.2d 131 .
discussed Cited "see" Raap v. Lenton (2×)
N.D. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
“To the extent that information is reasonably available, the average of the most recent five years of each self-employment activity, if undertaken on a substantially similar scale, must be used to determine self-employment income.” Id. (emphasis added); see Doepke v. Doepke, 2009 ND 10, ¶12 , 760 N.W.2d 131 (recognizing income from self-employment in farming should be averaged over a five-year period because of fluctuations in income).
cited Cited "see" Renville v. Renville
N.D. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doepke v. Doepke , 2009 ND 10, ¶ 21 , 760 N.W.2d 131 (denying a request for attorney’s fees when the party failed to provide any support for the request). [¶3] Gerald W.
cited Cited "see" State v. Tibor
N.D. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doepke v. Doepke , 2009 ND 10, ¶ 21 , 760 N.W.2d 131 .
cited Cited "see" Dupay v. Dupay
N.D. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doepke v. Doepke, 2009 ND 10, ¶ 21 , 760 N.W.2d 131 .
discussed Cited "see" Fleck v. Fleck
N.D. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doepke, 2009 ND 10, ¶ 7 , 760 N.W.2d 131 (“Under the child support guidelines, a self-employed individual’s child support obligation is generally calculated using an average of the individual’s self-employment income from the most recent five years.”) We also acknowledge the scant evidence in the record presented by the parties to assist the court in correctly determining Regan’s child support obligation.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kosobud v. Kosobud
N.D. · 2012 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Doepke v. Doepke, 2009 ND 10, ¶ 7 , 760 N.W.2d 131 (“Under the child support guidelines, a self-employed individual’s child support obligation is generally calculated using an average of the individual’s self-employment income from the most recent five years.”) Courts in this state have used income averaging to resolve divorce-related financial issues other than child support.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Doepke
v.
Doepke
20080142.
North Dakota Supreme Court.
Feb 3, 2009.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published

Filed 2/3/09 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2009 ND 2

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Curtis Lee Cahoon, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20080173

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Pamela A. Nesvig, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5518, Bismarck, ND 58506-5518, for plaintiff and appellee.

Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, ND 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Cahoon

No. 20080173

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Curtis Cahoon appealed from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of violating a disorderly conduct restraining order.  On appeal, Cahoon argued the district court erred when it denied his motion for judgment of acquittal, contending there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom