green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Pennsylvania Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Penntech Papers, Inc., Intervenors
See Municipal Light Bds. v. FPC, 450 F.2d 1341, 1345-46 (D.C.Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 455 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kleinbart v. United States
See United States v. Thompson, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 4 n. 7, 452 F.2d 1333 , 1336 n. 7 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 998 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 467 (1972); see also Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432, 453 , 15 *872 S.Ct. 394, 403, 39 L.Ed. 481 (1895) (“The principle that there is a presumption of innocence in favor of the accused is the undoubted law, axiomatic and elementary, and its enforcement lies at the foundation of the administration of our criminal law.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Silberman
See United States v. Thompson, 452 F.2d 1333, 1337 (D.C.Cir.1971), ce rt. denied, 405 U.S. 998 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 467 (1972); see also Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340 , 107 S.Ct. 1160, 1168 , 94 L.Ed.2d 364 (1987); McDonald v. Board of Election Comm’rs, 394 U.S. 802 , 89 S.Ct. 1404, 1408 , 22 L.Ed.2d 739 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ahmad v. Wigen
Accord, e.g., Garcia-Guillern v. United States, 450 F.2d 1189 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 455 (1972); Peroff v. Hylton, 542 F.2d 1247 (4th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 787 , 50 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977). “[Supervising the integrity of the judicial system of another sovereign nation ... would directly conflict with the principle of comity upon which extradition is based.” Jhirad v. Ferrandina, 536 F.2d 478, 485 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 833 , 97 S.Ct. 97 , 50 L.Ed.2d 98 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re the Extradition of Singh
Accord Garcia-Guillern v. United States, 450 F.2d 1189, 1192 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 455 (1972); In re Gonzalez, 217 F.Supp. 717, 722-23 (S.D.N.Y.1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jersey Central Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc., Intervenors
(2×)
See Municipal Light Boards v. Federal Power Commission, 450 F.2d 1341 (D.C.Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 455 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerome F. Donelson, United States of America v. Andre Washington
See United States v. Thompson, 147 U.S. App.D.C. 1, 452 F.2d 1333 (1971), cert. de *591 nied, 405 U.S. 998 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 467 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Burlington Northern Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission
See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. CAB, 543 F.2d 247 (D.C.Cir.1976) (Federal Aviation Act), quoting Municipal Light Bds. v. FPC, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 294 , 450 F.2d 1341, 1346 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 445 (1972) (Federal Power Act) ("(rejection is a) peremptory form of response to filed tariffs which classically is used not to dispose of a matter on the merits but rather as a technique for calling on the filing party to put its papers in proper form and order.") In Delta Air Lines the court held that the Civil Aeronautics Board cannot reserve its power of rejection…
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Burlington Northern Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission
See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. CAB, 543 F.2d 247, 264 (D.C.Cir.1976) (Federal Aviation Act), quoting Municipal Light Bds. v. FPC, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 294 , 450 F.2d 1341, 1346 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 445 (1972) (Federal Power Act) ('[rejection is a] peremptory form of response to filed tariffs which classically is used not to dispose of a matter on the merits but rather as a technique for calling on the filing party to put its papers in proper form and order.') In Delta Air Lines the court held that the Civil Aeronautics Board cannot reserve its power of reje…
cited
Cited "see"
The Superior Oil Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Municipal Light Boards of Reading and Wakefield, Massachusetts v. FPC, 450 F.2d 1341, 1345 (D.C.Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 445 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. v. United States
See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. CAB, 543 F.2d 247, 264 (D.C.Cir.1976) (Federal Aviation Act), quoting Municipal Light Bds. v. FPC, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 294 , 450 F.2d 1341, 1346 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 445 (1972) (Federal Power Act) (“[rejection is a] peremptory form of response to filed tariffs which classically is used not to dispose of a matter on the merits but rather as a technique for calling on the filing party to put its papers in proper form and order.”) In Delta Air Lines the court held that the Civil Aeronautics Board cannot reserve its power of …
discussed
Cited "see"
Public Service Company of New Mexico v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Cities of Gallup and Farmington, New Mexico Plains Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative, Inc., Intervenors. Public Service Company of New Mexico v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Cities of Gallup and Farmington, New Mexico Plains Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative, Inc., Intervenors
We have considered these issues as presented by PNM and find them to be without merit. 56 PNM admits that the Commission has the authority to dispose of issues summarily if "there is no need for a hearing." Initial Brief of Petitioner, Public Service Company of New Mexico at 33; See Municipal Light Boards of Reading and Wakefield Massachusetts v. FPC, 450 F.2d 1341, 1345 (D.C.Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 445 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See note 20 Infra 18 See 18 C.F.R. § 35.13 (b)(4)(iii) (1978) 19 Brief for Petitioners at 36 20 In Municipal Light Bds. v. FPC, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 294 , 450 F.2d 1341 (1971), Cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 455 (1972), we held that § 35.13(b)(4)(i) of the Commission's regulations, 18 C.F.R. § 35.13 (b)(4)(i) (1978), summoning a filing utility to submit, 60 days prior to the effective date of a proposed increased rate, a statement showing its cost of the service to be supplied under the new rate schedule, "does not confer a procedural benefit on other parties that entit…
discussed
Cited "see"
Wisconsin Electric Power Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Cities of New London and Shawano, Wisconsin, Intervenors. The Cities of New London and Shawano, Wisconsin v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Wisconsin Michigan Power Company, Intervenor. Wisconsin Electric Power Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Cities of New London and Shawano, Wisconsin, Intervenors. The Cities of New London and Shawano, Wisconsin v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Wisconsin Michigan Power Co., Intervenor
See Municipal Light Boards of Reading and Wakefield, Massachusetts v. FPC, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 294, 298-99 , 450 F.2d 1341, 1345-46 (1971), Cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 445 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
See United States v. Thompson, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 4, 452 F.2d 1333, 1337 (1971), Cert. denied, 405 U.S. 998 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 467 (1972). 23 The statute in question is particularly suited to judicial construction.
cited
Cited "see"
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Right to Work Legal Defense & Education Foundation, Inc.
See United States v. Thompson, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 4, 452 F.2d 1333, 1337 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 998 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 467 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Bethea v. United States
See note 68, supra. Appellant’s reliance on United States v. Thompson, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 452 F.2d 1333 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 998 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Beachey L. Wright
See United States v. Thompson, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 452 F.2d 1333 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 998 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 467 (1972), discussed in relation to § 301 in United States v. (La Vance) Greene, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 21, 48-49 , 489 F.2d 1145, 1172-73 (1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 190 (1974) (Statement of Bazelon, C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Medynski v. Margolis
(2×)
See United States v. Thompson, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 4-9, 452 F.2d 1333, 1336-1341 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 998 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis T. McDonald
(3×)
See United States v. Thompson, 147 U. S.App.D.C. 1, 452 F.2d 1333, 1341 , (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 998 , 92 S. Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 467 (1972). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Biton v. Palestinian Interim Self-Government Authority
See also Garcia-Guillern v. United States, 450 F.2d 1189, 1192 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 455 (1972) (offense must occur “in the course of or incidental to” hostilities).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Florida Progress Corp. v. United States
See Union Hollywood Water Co. v. Carter, 238 F. 329 (9th Cir.1917) (finding that expenses related to installing connections and pipe extensions were not deductible because they were invested in permanent improvements, which tend to enhance the rental and market value of the water system); see also Idaho Power, 418 U.S. at 13 , 94 S.Ct. 2757 (holding that depreciation on equipment used to construct transmission lines, distribution lines, and connecting facilities must be capitalized as part of those assets); see also Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. U.S., 449 F.2d 816 (10th Cir.1971), cert. denied, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Apache Survival Coalition v. United States
Communication Workers of Am. v. Beck, 487 U.S. 735, 762 , 108 S.Ct. 2641, 2657 , 101 L.Ed.2d 634 (1988) (same); Gray, 989 F.2d at 1568 (quoting Communication Workers); see also Blitz v. Donovan, 740 F.2d 1241, 1244 (D.C.Cir.1984) (“ “When a statute is fairly subject to a variety of interpretations all but one of which would make it unconstitutional, then the courts must presume Congress intended the interpretation which is constitutionally permissible.’ ” (quoting United States v. Thompson, 452 F.2d 1333, 1337 (D.C.Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 998 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 467 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Apache Survival Coalition v. United States of America, and James Abbott, in His Official Capacity as Supervisor, Coronado National Forest, and the University of Arizona, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. Apache Survival Coalition v. United States of America, and James Abbott, in His Official Capacity as Supervisor, Coronado National Forest, and the University of Arizona, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee
DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Build. & Const. Trades Council, 485 U.S. 568, 575 , 108 S.Ct. 1392, 1397 , 99 L.Ed.2d 645 (1988) ("[W]here an otherwise acceptable construction of a statute would raise serious constitutional problems, the Court will construe the statute to avoid such problems...."); Communication Workers of Am. v. Beck, 487 U.S. 735, 762 , 108 S.Ct. 2641, 2657 , 101 L.Ed.2d 634 (1988) (same); Gray, 989 F.2d at 1568 (quoting Communication Workers); see also Blitz v. Donovan, 740 F.2d 1241, 1244 (D.C.Cir.1984) (" 'When a statute is fairly subject to a variety of interpretat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
US West Communications, Inc. v. New Mexico State Corp. Commission
See, e.g., Municipal Light Bds. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 450 F.2d 1341, 1345 (D.C.Cir.1971) (holding that commission may reject any filing that “patently is either deficient in form or a substantive nullity”), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 455 (1972); Intermountain Gas Co. v. Idaho Pub.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Koskotas v. Roche
Quinn v. Robinson, 783 F.2d at 797 (citations and footnotes omitted) (finding the incidence test “not only workable but desirable” despite some recent scholarly and judicial criticism — id. at 801 ); see also Garcia-Guillern v. United States, 450 F.2d 1189, 1192 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 455 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Esposito v. Adams
Nor does the matter fall within the scope of the limited habeas corpus review discussed supra at 1472-73; see also Freedman, 437 F.Supp. at 1258 (“ ‘[a] contention that [the person whose extradition is sought] has never been properly or legally charged with a crime in accordance with the treaty is not appropriate for consideration’ in habeas corpus proceedings brought to review the order of commitment.”) (quoting Ga rcia-Guillern v. United States, 450 F.2d 1189 , 1193 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, *1475 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 455 (1971)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re the Extradition of Singh
Compare Eain v. Wilkes, supra, 641 F.2d at 520 (burden of proof of applicability of Political Offense Exception on defendant) and Garcia-Guillern v. United States, 450 F.2d 1189, 1192 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 455 (1972) (same) with Ramos v. Diaz, 179 F.Supp. 459, 463 (S.D.Fla.1959) (burden of production of defendant; burden of persuasion on Government). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sindona v. Grant
See, e. g., Garcia-Guillern v. United States, 450 F.2d 1189, 1192 (5 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 455 (1972); Jimenez v. Aristequieta, 311 F.2d 547, 560 (5 Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 914 , 83 S.Ct. 1302 , 10 L.Ed.2d 415 (1963); In re Ezeta, 62 F. 972, 977-1002 (N.D.Cal.1894).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michele Sindona v. George v. Grant, United States Marshal for the Southern District of New York, George v. Grant, United States Marshal for the Southern District of New York v. Michele Sindona
See, e. g., Garcia-Guillern v. United States, 450 F.2d 1189, 1192 (5 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 455 (1972); Jimenez v. Aristequieta, 311 F.2d 547, 560 (5 Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 914 , 83 S.Ct. 1302 , 10 L.Ed.2d 415 (1963); In re Ezeta, 62 F. 972, 977-1002 (N.D.Cal.1894).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Monfort of Colorado, Inc., Successor in Interest to Monfort Feed Lots, Inc. v. United States
See also Colorado Springs National Bank v. United States, 505 F.2d 1185 (10th Cir. 1974) and Mountain Fuel Supply Company v. United States, 449 F.2d 816 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 455 (1972), for our holding that compulsory accounting rules of a regulatory agency do not control tax consequences.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Portland Cement Association v. Ruckelshaus
Compare United States v. Thompson, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 13, 452 F.2d 1333, 1345 (1971), cert, denied, 405 U.S. 998 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 467 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Municipal Light Board of Reading, Massachusetts
v.
Federal Power Commission
v.
Federal Power Commission
No. 71-902.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 20, 1972.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.