Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 405 U.S. 1062 (1972).

Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 405 U.S. 1062 (1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

neutral Cited (no substantive treatment) 0.3 score

2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 2

Treatment by court

ca4		0R/0Y/0G	1
scotus		0R/0Y/0G	1

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

Schneckloth, Conservation Center Superintendent
v.
Bustamonte

No. 71-732.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Apr 17, 1972.

405 U.S. 1062

92 S. Ct. 1491

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Published

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 953.] Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Stuart P. Tobisman, Esquire, of Los Angeles, California, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for respondent pro hac vice in this case.