green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Alexander v. State
See People v. Morse, 60 Cal.2d 631 , 36 Cal.Rptr. 201, 215 , 388 P.2d 33, 47 (1964), where the court stated that defendant’s failure to object to an erroneous instruction at trial did not foreclose review on appeal because an objection would have been “useless and unavailing.” Cf. People v. Terry, 2 Cal.3d 362 , 85 Cal.Rptr. 409, 432 , 466 P.2d 961, 984 (Cal.1970), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 912 , 92 S.Ct. 1619 , 32 L.Ed.2d 112 (1972) (citation omitted): However, it is settled that when an objection and an admonition could not cure the prejudice caused by improper remarks, failure to object …
discussed
Cited "see"
Besig v. Friend
See County of Alameda v. Carleson, 5 Cal.3d 730, 746 , 97 Cal.Rptr. 385, 396 , 488 P.2d 953, 964 (1971), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 406 U.S. 913 , 92 S.Ct. 1762 , 32 L.Ed.2d 112 (1972). 10 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Montana Ninth Judicial District Court
See, e.g., People v. Terry (1970), 2 Cal. 3d 362 , 85 Cal. Rptr. 409 , 466 P.2d 961 , cert. denied, 406 U.S. 912 , 92 S. Ct. 1619 , 32 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ruth
See, e.g., People v. Terry, 2 Cal. 3d 362, 466 P.2d 961 (1970), cert. dismissed, 406 U.S. 912 , 92 S. Ct. 1619 , 32 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Berrigan v. Sigler
See also Washington Post Co. v. Kleindienst, 357 F.Supp. 770 (D.D.C.1972), ibid, 406 U.S. 912 , 92 S.Ct. 1761 , 32 L.Ed.2d 112 (1972), and 477 F.2d 1168 (D.C.Cir. 1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Berrigan v. Sigler
See also Washington Post Co. v. Kleindienst, 357 F.Supp. 770 (D.D.C.1972), ibid, 406 U.S. 912 , 92 S.Ct. 1761 , 32 L.Ed.2d 112 (1972), and 477 F.2d 1168 (D.C.Cir. 1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
County of Alameda
v.
California Welfare Rights Organization
v.
California Welfare Rights Organization
No. 71-801.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 15, 1972.
Cited by 53 opinions | Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Cal. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.